Proteorhodopsin is a simple light driven pump, used by microorganisms
within the surface waters of the ocean to generate additional ATP, without
carbon and other typical ATP generation processes. This means the light driven
pump could produce ATP under anaerobic, energy-starved conditions. This is
exactly what Wang and his colleagues investigated in 2015. The ability to
generate ATP by proteorhodopsin under anaerobic conditions has useful
applications in bio-chemical production, such as the production of succinate
and 1,4-butanediol. Anaerobic pathways theoretically have higher yields than aerobic
at lower costs, but will often have lower biomass yields, usually attributed to
less available ATP. If there was a way to obtain higher biomass because of higher
ATP generation under anaerobic conditions, it would be much cheaper. Until Wang et al. (2015) it was not known if proteorhodopsin
could produce enough ATP under anaerobic conditions to promote cell growth.
Wang et al. inserted
the SAR86 proteorhodopsin gene into an Escherichia coli strain, prevented
respiration by inhibiting a cyctochrome (hemD)
and measured growth along with ATP production. They found 50% more
ATP production when exposed to light than those kept in the dark, demonstrating
that photophosphorylation can and does occur. To prove that anaerobic ATP
production can produce enough energy to fuel growth they used lactate as a
carbon source and found 10% more growth was exhibited in the first three hours,
which positively correlated with ATP production. Thus, proteorhodopsin can
produce enough ATP to allow growth under anaerobic conditions.
Although growth did occur, it was only for a limited window.
This may have been because of a limited number of proteorhodopsin molecules,
compared to ATP synthase. Thus, may not be quite as useful for bio-chemical
applications as Wang et al. made out.
Also, only one strain of E. coli was
used and of three strains of proteorhodopsin genes , the SAR86 proteorhodopsin
gene was the only one to be successful in producing enough ATP to promote cell
growth. However, the paper is accessible and gives experimental
limitations with explanations, such as not using Sodium Azide because it decomposes
under light and can kill E. coli at
high concentrations; a useful feature for others who wish to further study this
idea.
The promotion of growth in E. coli under anaerobic, energy-starving conditions, may provide a
potential explanation as to why the proteorhodopsin suite of genes is so ubiquitous among microbes, though not all experience these conditions.
Hi Chloe,
ReplyDeleteDo you think anything learned in this study can be applied to the ecological and cellular role of PR in the relevant bacterioplankton species? The authors of this paper appear to be conducting this research in order to exploit the biotechnical applications of PR as opposed to realistically modelling cellular activity of marine Bacteria species ‘in the wild’. While I appreciate that pelagic marine species are difficult to culture for laboratory experiments and much has been done with recombinant PR +ve E. coli, many of these studies have subsequently been replicated in marine bacterioplankton to gain validity (for example, Beja et al, 2001 performed laser-flash photolysis on the membranes of native environmental species to support similar findings in E. coli-expressed PR). Several FISH studies have shown that major PR +ve clades such as SAR86 are abundant in surface waters (even one conducted at the L4 here in Plymouth – Mary et al, 2006), which makes sense if PR is light-dependent. Therefore, do you think that the majority of PR +ve taxa would often (if ever) experience environmental anaerobic conditions? Is this likely to be a contributing factor to their metabolism and ecophysiology? Do you think if this study would be repeated in native SAR86 cells, for example, the result would be similar? It’d be great to know what you think.
Béja, O., Spudich, E. N., Spudich, J. L., Leclerc, M., & DeLong, E. F. (2001). Proteorhodopsin phototrophy in the ocean. Nature, 411(6839), 786-789.
Mary, I., Cummings, D. G., Biegala, I. C., Burkill, P. H., Archer, S. D., & Zubkov, M. V. (2006). Seasonal dynamics of bacterioplankton community structure at a coastal station in the western English Channel. Aquatic microbial ecology, 42(2), 119-126.
Thanks,
Davis