In this study three of the genes encoding for the
degradation of DMSP were measured dmdA
coding for bacterial demethylation and both dddL
and dddP coding for DMS
production. The dmdA genes where
found to be confined to bacteria within the Roseobacter
clade and the dddL gene was confined
more specifically to the genus Sulfitobacter.
The dddP gene again was mainly found within
the Roseobacter clade but there were
a few genes found associated with both Alphaproteobacter and Gammaproteobacter.
The prokaryotic community that is found in Kongsfjorden is dominated by bacteria
with much lower levels of archaea in the survey areas.
3 sites placed around Kongsfjorden where sampled with only
the surface water being sampled as this is the main area of DMSP production and
where you are most likely to find any bacterial genes associated with DMSP
breakdown. The researchers found that the highest amounts of bacteria present
in the surface waters occurred during the months of May and July. The further
up the fjord the sample sites went the detected levels of dddP and dddL dropped; to
zero in the case of dddP. This shows
that in shallower coastal waters the major route of DSMP degradation is by the demethylation
process which in turn suggests the majority of the DMSP sulphur is assimilated
by the bacteria.
This paper slightly alters the accepted view that most DMSP
is degraded into DMS instead it shows that in shallower coastal waters most
DMSP is demethylated into MMPA instead which would have the effect of reducing
the amount of sulphate entering the atmosphere. Further studies would be needed
to test whether this happens in all shallow coastal waters or whether it just
occurs in Fjords and other semi-enclosed bodies of water and it could also test
how deep into the water column that DMSP degradation genes are found.
Paper Reviewed
Zeng, Y. X., Qiao, Z. Y., Yu, Y., Li, H. R., & Luo, W.
(2016). Diversity of bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate degradation genes in
surface seawater of Arctic Kongsfjorden. Scientific Reports, 6. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep33031
Hi James,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your post. I've noticed from your review and the paper that the authors design their primers and target their study at specifically bacterial DMSP degradation genes while not focusing on eukaryotic signatures. Seeing as the phytoplankton which produce DMSP typically synthesise their own DMSP-lyases that degrade DMSP upon cell lysis, how significant do you think bacterial degradation is relative to this process? Would incorporating eukaryotic DMSP degradation (and DMS production) into this study draw significance away from bacterial demethylation or would the result hold true? It'd be great to know what you think.
Thanks,
Davis