Tuesday, 11 October 2016

An endosymbiont in a dead host – what next?

Many organisms use endosymbionts to feed. So does the deep-sea hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila. Inside of its body live the thiotrophic endosymbiont Candidatus Endoriftia persephone (Endoriftia). R. pachyptila provides all substrates required for chemosynthesis to Endoriftia and in return the endosymbiont nourishes R. pachyptila entirely with released fixed organic carbon (Klose et al., 2015). But what happens if the tubeworm dies? To investigate this Klose et al. conducted a study which deals with the releasing of Endoriftia after R. pachyptila’s death.
Klose et al. found that only live symbionts were released of the dead hosts. The releasing happened faster under experimental vent conditions (22 °C) - which imitate the natural conditions of R. pachyptila - than in experimental deep-sea conditions (4 °C). A high number of symbionts were released over a short period of time (half a day under vent conditions) which led to an increased number of free-living Endoriftia. The releasing of symbionts can be a mechanism to spread within the host population and to infect new hosts. The investigations were conducted in the laboratory simulating vent and deep-sea conditions. The scientists used FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridisation) and epiflourescence microscopy to detect the release of Endoriftia. In their conclusion they state that with the knowledge of this study they are now able to decrypt the ‘stability of this mutualism in situ’ (Klose et al., 2015).
This study gives an insight of adaption mechanisms of endosymbionts to new environments or within the host. I think it would be interesting to see whether other species of tubeworms and endosymbionts use the same mechanism to adapt and to spread the population. Furthermore I agree with Klose et al. that it is also important to see whether this mechanism of releasing occur in situ or not.


Reviewed paper:
Klose, J., Polz, M. F., Wagner, M., Schimak, M. P., Gollner, S., Bright, M. (2015). Endosymbionts escape dead hydrothermal vent tubeworms to enrich the free-living population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(36), 11300-11305. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/36/11300.full#content-block

1 comment:

  1. Hi Eleni,

    An interesting paper that highlights how little we know about the interactions between some organisms in the deep sea!
    I agree with you that this paper begins to unravel the complex interactions between R. pachyptila and Endoriftia, but much more is needed to fully understand the symbiosis. It would be interesting to know how long the Endoriftia can survive after escaping the host tissue, as this could shed some light on their ecology. If they can survive independently for a long time, then could there be free-living populations that never infect a host?
    A more recent paper by Perez & Juniper finds that 5 species of eastern Pacific vent worms (including R. pachyptila) all share the same type of endosymbiont, which follows on from Klose's paper nicely, suggesting that the large amount of Endoriftia released upon worm clump death must be able to survive for quite a while until they are brought to a new host by mobile fauna/currents/etc.

    Perez M. & Juniper K.S.(2016) Insights into Symbiont Population Structure among Three Vestimentiferan Tubeworm Host Species at Eastern Pacific Spreading Centers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.82(17).5197-5205.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27316954

    ReplyDelete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.