Many
organisms use endosymbionts to feed. So does the deep-sea
hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia
pachyptila. Inside of its body live the
thiotrophic endosymbiont Candidatus
Endoriftia persephone (Endoriftia).
R. pachyptila provides
all substrates required for chemosynthesis to Endoriftia
and in return the endosymbiont nourishes R.
pachyptila entirely with released fixed
organic carbon (Klose et al.,
2015). But what happens if the tubeworm dies? To investigate this
Klose et al. conducted
a study which deals with the releasing of Endoriftia
after R. pachyptila’s
death.
Klose
et al.
found that only live symbionts were released of the dead hosts.
The releasing happened faster under experimental vent conditions
(22 °C) - which imitate the natural conditions of R.
pachyptila - than in experimental
deep-sea conditions (4 °C). A high number of symbionts were
released over a short period of time (half a day under vent
conditions) which led to an increased number of free-living
Endoriftia.
The releasing of symbionts can be a mechanism to spread within the
host population and to infect new hosts. The investigations were
conducted in the laboratory simulating vent and deep-sea conditions.
The scientists used FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridisation) and
epiflourescence microscopy to detect the release of Endoriftia.
In their conclusion they state that with the knowledge of this study
they are now able to decrypt the ‘stability of this mutualism in
situ’ (Klose et al.,
2015).
This
study gives an insight of adaption mechanisms of endosymbionts to new
environments or within the host. I think it would be interesting to
see whether other species of tubeworms and endosymbionts use the same
mechanism to adapt and to spread the population. Furthermore I agree
with Klose et al.
that it is also important to see whether this mechanism of releasing
occur in situ or not.
Reviewed
paper:
Klose,
J., Polz, M. F., Wagner, M., Schimak, M. P., Gollner, S., Bright, M.
(2015). Endosymbionts escape dead hydrothermal vent tubeworms to
enrich the free-living population. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences,
112(36),
11300-11305. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/36/11300.full#content-block
Hi Eleni,
ReplyDeleteAn interesting paper that highlights how little we know about the interactions between some organisms in the deep sea!
I agree with you that this paper begins to unravel the complex interactions between R. pachyptila and Endoriftia, but much more is needed to fully understand the symbiosis. It would be interesting to know how long the Endoriftia can survive after escaping the host tissue, as this could shed some light on their ecology. If they can survive independently for a long time, then could there be free-living populations that never infect a host?
A more recent paper by Perez & Juniper finds that 5 species of eastern Pacific vent worms (including R. pachyptila) all share the same type of endosymbiont, which follows on from Klose's paper nicely, suggesting that the large amount of Endoriftia released upon worm clump death must be able to survive for quite a while until they are brought to a new host by mobile fauna/currents/etc.
Perez M. & Juniper K.S.(2016) Insights into Symbiont Population Structure among Three Vestimentiferan Tubeworm Host Species at Eastern Pacific Spreading Centers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.82(17).5197-5205.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27316954