A recent
study by Wentrup et al (2014), looked at how and
if species of deep sea clams and mussels were able to continue obtaining new symbionts
throughout their life. Bivalves show continuous gill growth which raised the
question as to how these new areas of gills are colonised the two possible
ways were from the surrounding environment or from self-infection from
symbionts already occurring on the bivalves. As with much of deep sea research
these questions have previously been hard to answer due to limitations in cultivating
deep-sea bivalves. This study overcame these limitations by using the method fluorescence
insitu hybridization (FISH) with probes specific to the symbionts, along with transmission
electron microscopy to examine mussel and clam gill tissues.
In total 4 different species of clams
and mussels were investigated both of which showed either horizontal or
vertical transmission. I believe it was important to represent both
transmission types as colonization could be different between horizontally and
vertically transmitted symbionts.
The finding found that sulfur and
methane oxidising symbionts co-occurred intracellularly in gill bacteriocytes,
the symbionts were also found to change the morphology of the host cells which
became flatter and wider with the reduction of
microvilli on their surface, however they were absent from the ends of the
filaments at the frontal gill surfaces. The first newly formed filaments to
show symbionts present evident by FISH signals were the seventh to ninth
filaments. A gradient was also found to occur with the youngest gills filaments
containing less symbionts then slightly older gill filaments.Two factors were found to be important in symbiont colonization, firstly developmental stage, the findings indicated that colonization can only occur after the host cell has reach a certain differentiation stage (seventh to ninth filaments).
Secondly symbiont source was important there were two different ways symbionts could be transmitted either from the environment which would include free living symbionts or symbionts from co-occurring individuals, or alternately from within the host via self-infection. The results suggest that self-infection is the best explanation, the first gill cells to become colonized were always located closest to already colonized gill tissue. Both the anterior side and the posterior side of the filament are formed at the same time however the anterior side which was closest to already colonized gill tissue was always colonized first if symbionts were transmitted from the environment the distribution would be expected to be random between areas of gill tissue of the same age.
One limitation of the study is although it shows that self-infection is most likely the source of the symbionts the addition of environmental symbionts might also be possible especially under certain conditions such as during early development stages, or where uptake of locally adapted free living symbionts would produce a strong selection advantage, or if the internal population reduces due to internal stress. Future work hopes to address this by looking at the genetics of symbionts within the host and how related the population within the host are. I think taking into account different environmental condition between areas is a good focus for further research because the environment could be driving some of the changes in symbiont colonization.
Wentrup, C., Wendeberg, A., Schimak, M., Borowski, C. and Dubilier, N. (2014). Forever competent: deep-sea bivalves are colonized by their chemosynthetic symbionts throughout their lifetime. Environmental Microbiology, 16(12), pp.3699-3713.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments from external users are moderated before posting.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.