Since Proctor and Fuhrman (1991) first exposed researchers
to the significance of marine viruses in microbial energy flow, the importance
of viral interactions in the ‘microbial loop’ has become increasingly well
understood. The term ‘viral shunt’ was subsequently coined to refer to the
redirection of carbon flow away from higher trophic levels by viral lysis to
DOM/POM pools (see Suttle, 2007). Marine environments can be, however,
chemically heterogeneous systems characterised by areas of micronutrient
limitation preventing optimal biological activity – particularly iron (Fe),
which exhibits poor solubility in seawater. Research is lacking as to how Fe
limitation affects viral shunting, however a recent paper has aimed to remedy
this.
Slagter and others (2016) explored the effect of Fe
limitation on the infectivity of two dsDNA viruses (MpV and PgV) that infect
globally abundant phytoplankton species (the prasinophyte Micromonas pusilla and the haptophyte Phaeocystis globosa respectively). Algal monocultures were
cultivated under ecologically realistic Fe-limited or Fe-controlled media, and
were later inoculated with viral lysates produced on Fe-limited or
Fe-controlled host cultures. Infected cell cultures were monitored for viral
infectivity (endpoint dilution assay) and pigment composition (high pressure
liquid chromatography (HPLC) followed by spectroscopy). For both viruses, the
‘burst size’ (number of viral progeny lysed cell‑1) was reduced ~30%
under Fe-limitation, however only MpV exhibited reduced infectivity under the
same treatment.
Interestingly, when Fe-control
lysates were introduced into Fe-limited cell cultures, the acute spike in Fe
concentration only partially aided the production of viral progeny and failed
to counteract the deleterious effects of Fe-limitation, suggesting that the impaired
physiological history of the host was a major factor in suppressing viral
activity. This is supported by evidence from the HPLC pigment analysis, which
shifted away from the production of photosynthetic primary pigments such as
chlorophyll-a to photoprotective
stress xanthophylls in both Fe-limited algal species, indicating a reversal
from normal metabolic activity.
Overall, this study offered an
intriguing insight into the effect of Fe-limitation on viral lysis and has
implications in understanding the complexities of viral shunting. Iron is
integral to central cellular metabolic pathways, by acting as a cofactor in enzymes involved in photosynthesis, respiration and DNA repair. The authors
hypothesise that suppression of host metabolic processes through Fe-limitation would
deleteriously affect virus production, which hijacks such machinery. However, I
am cautious in accepting this explanation outright as investigations as to the
viral particles’ intrinsic requirement for iron is lacking in this
investigation. Some bacteriophages, for example, bind Fe atoms to proteinaceous
fibrils to aid in host attachment and therefore the authors may be missing a
contributory factor outside of host physiology. The ubiquity of the selected
algal species makes them good choices for model organisms, however the
differential response of the viruses in this study stresses the importance of
further study in different algal supergroups and viral taxa. I would be
fascinated to see this study repeated in diatoms, some species of which have
evolved to survive environmental Fe-limitation by reducing their intracellular
Fe-demand (Thalassiosira oceanica has
replaced Fe-containing electron transport cytochromes with the copper-based
plastocyanin). Would host resistance to Fe-limitation in turn support viral
production? Nevertheless, this study
augments our understanding of the chemical complexities of viral shunting and
provides researchers with a more thorough understanding of viral carbon flow in
marine systems.
Reviewed paper: Slagter, H. A., Gerringa, L. J., & Brussaard, C. P. (2016). Phytoplankton Virus Production Negatively Affected by Iron Limitation. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, 156. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2016.00156/full
Further Reading:
Review of marine viruses: Suttle, C. A. (2007). Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem.Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(10), 801-812. http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v5/n10/abs/nrmicro1750.html
Iron in a bacteriophage: Bartual, S. G., Otero, J. M., Garcia-Doval, C., Llamas-Saiz, A. L., Kahn, R., Fox, G. C., & van Raaij, M. J. (2010). Structure of the bacteriophage T4 long tail fiber receptor-binding tip. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(47), 20287-20292. http://www.pnas.org/content/107/47/20287.short
Plastocyanin in diatoms: Peers, G., & Price, N. M. (2006). Copper-containing plastocyanin used for electron transport by an oceanic diatom. Nature, 441(7091), 341-344.http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v441/n7091/abs/nature04630.html
Hi Davis,
ReplyDeleteDo you think there would be a significant difference in the results if the oxygen saturation level of the water was changed? Obviously if the oxygen level was increased then more Fe would be oxidised becoming less available, but if the oxygen level was dropped to a point in which the aerobic organisms could still survive but more Fe becomes available, would this make a difference?
Thanks,
Evan
Hi Evan,
ReplyDeleteYou raise a great point! As you are well aware, when oxygen rises the more bioavailable ferrous Fe (II) becomes oxidised into the less bioavailable ferric Fe (III). However, multiple other factors such as oceanic salinity, temperature and pH can also have a drastic effect on Fe (II) oxidation, which can have drastic ramifications in regional micronutrient limitation. If we assume all other abiotic factors to be controlled, then lowering environmental PO2 may very well increase iron bioavailability to the host alga. However, if the authors are correct and viral production is inhibited by a depression in host physiology, then the rise in iron bioavailability may not counteract the negative effects to respiration brought about by hypoxia (likely to be deleterious to the vast majority of eukaryotes). It is certainly an intriguing idea, but I’m not sure how it would hold up in vivo. The behaviour of iron in planktonic systems is indeed complex, and you might be interested to read this review on the idiosyncrasies of its bioavailability:
Shaked, Y., & Lis, H. (2012). Disassembling iron availability to phytoplankton. Environmental Bioinorganic Chemistry of Aquatic Microbial Organisms, 28.
Thanks,
Davis