Larval settlement is a key process affecting both the population
dynamics and distribution of benthic invertebrates. Decision to settle is
affected by biotic influences such as cues released by algae but also by
epiphytic bacterial communities. Previous research into settlement and
epiphytes using culture-based methods revealed that specific isolates, such as
associates of Pseudoalteromonas luteoviolacea strongly induces
settlement. However, these effects often do not translate into mixed cultures
(more natural model systems). Furthermore, correlative culture independent
techniques have shown larvae are responsive to biofilm community composition.
However, it is difficult to assess if bacteria are responding to cues from the
community as a whole or specific members. Nielsen et al. attempted to address
this by examining settlement of the urchin species Heliocidaris
erythrogramma and Holopneustes purpurscens in response to the
epiphytic communities associated with different Coralline Red Algae.
Adult
urchins were collected from Long Bay,
Sydney during the reproductive season. Gametes were released and eggs
fertilized. Eggs were cultured in autoclaved seawater, under controlled
conditions with antibiotics. Five species of coralline algae, three
non-coralline macroalgal species and a control group of bio-filmed shell grit
were collected from the same habitat as the urchins. Algae were treated with
antibiotics to reduce abundance and diversity of epiphytic bacterial prior to
settlement assays. To verify antibiotic effectiveness, the two most abundant
species of coralline algae were examined and compared between antibiotic and
control treatments. Larval settlement assays were then conducted. Bacterial
communities were assessed to compare natural variation of bacterial community
composition. For the two most common coralline species larval settlement was
correlated against epiphytic bacterial community, using TRFLP (Terminal
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) to identify OTUs (operational
taxonomic units) and then carrying out multivariate statistics on this data.
Total epiphytic bacterial DNA was extracted and PCR targeting 16S rRNA genes ran.
TRF sizes were determined after electrophoresis by comparison with internal
size scanner. To determine in associates of P. luteoviolacea
induced settlement in
the community TRF lengths was compared to the TRF length of P. luteoviolacea.
In
this experiment, the settlement of sea urchin larvae was not particularly specific
to certain algal species. However, settlement did depend on the qualitative
and/or quantitative composition of the epiphytic bacterial community associated
with algae. Larval settlement of H. erythrogramma strongly
correlated with bacterial community composition whereas settlement of H. purpurscens was more general. The authors suggest that
urchin larvae respond to a complex natural bacterial community and are effected
by the relative abundance of inductive and inhibitive OTUs, however there is no
description of what they mean with inductive and inhibitive. Nielsen et al. also suggest that patterns of
larval settlement correlated with community composition and the relative abundance
of certain OUTs cannot be generalized and are species specific. There are
further limitations to this study. Firstly, TRFLP provides limited phylogenetic
information for microbial OTUs compared to other methods that could have been
used instead. However, the study did show that no OTUs correlated with
settlement were affiliated with P.
luteoviolacea. Furthermore, correlation between larval settlement and
bacterial community composition was only analysed for the coralline algae Amphiroa anceps and Corallina officinalis. This study is therefore missing important
information and may lead to the wrong conclusions. Additionally the scope of
the literature cited is limited, as the authors own relevant work was not
considered. Overall, this study provides an interesting but flawed
investigation into the effect of biofilms on larval settlement. Rather
unfortunately, it is a good example of how it is important to be discerning
when reading even the peer-reviewed literature.
Ref: Nielsen S.J.,
Harder T., Steinberg P.D. (2015). Sea urchin larvae decipher the epiphytic bacterial
community composition when selecting sites for attachment and
metamorphosis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 91:
doi: 10. 1093/femsec/fiu011.
Hi Tom, I agree that TRFLP may provide limited phylogenetic information. There's an article by Grant and Ogilvie (2003) which suggests the use of ordination methods such as principle component analysis or mutildimensional scaling could be used instead and these can give powerful insights into the data from the resulting visual displays. Do you think this would be a suitable alternative to use in this research?
ReplyDeleteQian et al., (2007) reviewed how biofilms act as mediators for colonisation. The properties of biofilms that mediate settlement include surface chemistry, micro-topography and microbial products ranging from from small-molecule metabolites to high-molecular weight extracellular polymers. Does the paper mention anything about the mechanism responsible for the preferential attachment of H. erythrogramma?
ReplyDelete