Vibrio anguillarum
is the causative agent of vibrosis, a haemorrhagic septicaemia disease of many
commercially important fish. Antibiotics are still the primary means by which
bacterial diseases are controlled in aquaculture, despite the increasing prevalence
of multi-resistant bacteria. It is essential that novel approaches to tacking
antibiotic resistance are developed; failure to do so would be detrimental.
Furthermore, typically broad-spectrum antibiotics are used; despite a greater
number of pathogenic bacteria being eliminated, this lack of specificity can devastate
the commensal bacterial consortia of the host. Whilst vaccines to treat
vibrosis exist, these target the O1 and O2 serotypes of V. anguillarum which are most associated with outbreaks of the
disease. However this vaccine does not effectively treat vibrosis induced by
the O3 serotype, which has increased in incidence in recent years. The use of
biological agents such as bacteriophages may be one means by which bacterial infection
is controlled. This has been exemplified in a number of studies in varying
fields. Higuera et al. (2013) provide
the first evidence in support of phage use in treating V. anguillarum infection, in the commercially important species, Salmo salar.
V. anguillarum samples
were donated to researchers; these were originally isolated from a number of
fish farm. The strains of the species used were determined using 16S rRNA
analysis. Phages were isolated from bivalves (mussels and clams); 6 phages (309,
ALMED, CHOED, ALME, CHOD and CHOB) were able to infect V. anguillarum, these were characterised using electrophoresis and electron
microscopy. 15 S.salar were added to
aquaria, and the water was inoculated with V.
anguillarum PF4 at a concentration of 5x105 CFU/ml, straight after
the CHOED phage was added to the water at a concentration to allow the required
multiplicity of infection (MOI) to be obtained. This same experimental system
was set up in a fish farm setting, where 100 S. salar were exposed to test conditions. Daily checks of mortality
were undertaken and dead individuals were removed then examined for the
presence of the pathogenic bacteria. Regular
examination of bacterial and phage concentrations was performed, along with the
necessary dilutions.
When added to the water V.
anguillarum (5x105 CFU/ml) with no phage present, mortality was
observed in the salmon from day one, by day six there was 93% mortality. With addition
of the CHOED bacteriophage at a concentration of 1 PFU/bacterial cell, fish
survived up to 10 days, post-infection. In control conditions, 70% survival was
noted after 10 days post infection; this is not attributed to infection by V. anguillarum however, as no V. anguillarum individuals were noted in
or on the fish. When subject to a higher MOI of 20 PFU/bacterial cell, there
was a significant decline in the V.
anguillarum individuals present (2.9 x104 at day 1 post
infection, declining to <1.103 at day 6). At day 7 no V. anguillarum was detected in the
tanks, however phages were present in abundance with 1x106 PFU/cell.
However a large decline in the presence of Vibrio
was observed even when not subject to bacteriophage infection. In the fish farm setting, 20 days
post-infection (with V. anguillarum alone),
60% of S. salar were alive, however
with addition of the CHOED phage at 10 PFU/cell, 100% survival was observed
again after 20 days.
This study concludes that phages may be an alternate therapeutic tool to treat bacterial infection. The supporting evidence is not completely convincing; the paper did not state that any of the fish tested had contracted vibrosis, thus whether introduction of phages reduces vibrosis or merely the presence of V. anguillarum remains unanswered. Furthermore, introduction of these phages could have an impact on the microbiota of fish species, this too needs to be elucidated. In the literature, there is some debate about how phages are introduced as this could impact the results obtained. However, novel ideas such as this are vital in order to reduce the occurrence of antibiotic resistance.
This study concludes that phages may be an alternate therapeutic tool to treat bacterial infection. The supporting evidence is not completely convincing; the paper did not state that any of the fish tested had contracted vibrosis, thus whether introduction of phages reduces vibrosis or merely the presence of V. anguillarum remains unanswered. Furthermore, introduction of these phages could have an impact on the microbiota of fish species, this too needs to be elucidated. In the literature, there is some debate about how phages are introduced as this could impact the results obtained. However, novel ideas such as this are vital in order to reduce the occurrence of antibiotic resistance.
Jack
Reference
Higuera, G., Bastias, R., Tsertsvadze, G., Romero, J. and Espejo, R.T. (2013) Recently discovered Vibrio anguillarum phages can protect against experimentally induced vibrosis in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Aquaculture, 392 (295), 128-133.
Hi Jack,
ReplyDeleteI like the post as you're right, despite the ongoing 'evolution' of bacteria and how some are resisting to antibiotics, approaches need to be made to prevent outbreaks of disease. But, and like you quite rightly said, not at the expense of eliminating a widespread of bacteria by being unspecific and possibility eradicating healthy bacteria needed by the host.
This is a tough field because of the relatively fast life span and 'population turnover' leads to rapid evolution. Can we keep up? As soon as we find one solution, is there another strain introduced that is resistant. Novel approaches are essential as we need to get ahead of this rather than chasing the tail, but not at the expense of generalising the antibiotic and its target(s).
Thanks for the post.
Dean
Hi Dean - thanks for your comment.
DeleteMany of the studies I have looked at in this field seem to ignore the impact these antibiotic treatments have on the host's microflora; this is true in medicine, not just aquaculture. I think you raised a really interesting point also about evolution, maybe we can learn some things about the way bacteria evolve; closer examination and application of this could be a means by which antibiotic resistance can be tackled.
In terms of keeping up, I think it is possible. However, I think antibiotic resistance can only be reduced/eliminated through inter-disciplinary work; we need to take into account life-history, physiology, structural biology and environmental conditions (to name a few) - i'm not sure one discipline can effectively investigate all of this. Also, climate change needs to be thrown into the mix, adding yet another layer of complexity to the already mammoth task.
Jack
Hi Jack,
ReplyDeleteI really like this post, it clearly links with the lecture material from Dan and explains it even further. It would be interesting to see future studies examining the next generation for any sign of natural resistance to the vibrio, or any negative effect the phage may cause to them.
Thanks again for this post
Emma
Hi Emma, thank you for your comment!
DeleteYes, investigating whether there is some trans-generational resistance would be very enlightening. Examination of fish from an immunological perspective and looking at whether there is any acquired/adaptive immune responses would be really useful. However, naturally you'd expect there to be some concurrent adaptation by the Vibrio; if this process is deciphered, maybe another means by which Vibrio spp. can be targeted will be brought to light.
Thanks again!
Jack