Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is known as
one of the most potent neurotoxins and is a specific blocker of voltage-gated
sodium channels of excitable membranes of muscle and nerve tissues. It was
originally believed that it occurred exclusively in pufferfish, however, it has
been detected in an array of other species since; in the eggs of the California
newt Taricha torosa, other fish such
as gobies, and invertebrates including octopuses, crabs, shellfish, flat and
ribbon worms. TTX is produced primarily by marine bacteria, such as Pseudoalteromonas tetraodonis, certain
species of Pseudomonas and Vibrio, and it appears that it finds its way into
pufferfish through the food chain. Tissue-specific distribution of TTX has been
widely investigated with food hygiene as the main viewpoint, using mainly the
genus Takifugu. It has been revealed that it is commonly distributed in the
liver and ovaries, however, localisation in other tissues is species-specific;
i.e., besides finding TTX in the liver and ovaries of Takifugu rubripes, it was found to be concentrated in the skin and
intestine and marginally present in the testes and skeletal muscle in Takifugu niphobles. Previous work by
Itoi et al., has revealed that tissue-specific
distribution and the amount of TTX in the mature pufferfish T. niphobles were sex-dependent; female
gonads and male liver showed the highest concentrations of TXT followed by male
skin. Following this, suggestions that TTX may act as a chemical defence
against predators has surfaced, additionally, it has been suggested that it may
be used as a pheromone during spawning giving larvae an advantage for survival.
In this study, Itoi et al.,
(2014) conducted predation experiments, measurement, and immunohistochemical
analysis to reveal the effect of TTX as a chemical defence in pufferfish
larvae. Predation behaviour was observed using larvae of up to four days old post-hatch;
juveniles of Japanese flounder Paralichthys
olivaceus and sea bass Lateolabrax
sp. were used as the predatory fish against T.
rubripes larvae. For T. niphobles
larvae, juveniles of fish such as Yatabe blennies (Parablennius yatabei and Omobranchus
elegans), gobies (Chaenogobius
annularis and Tridentiger
trigonocephalus) and Smallscale blackfish (Girella punctata) were used as the predators. Juveniles of G. punctata were also used as predators
against T. niphobles eggs. Adult brine
shrimp (Artemia sp.) and medaka
larvae were used as negative control for the prey. For TTX quantification, the
method sounds quite complex and I can insert it is the comments field if
anybody wants to review in more detail. However, the overall gist of it was
quantifying the positive charged TTX via Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass
Spectrometry (LC-MSMS) from 60–100 specimens of pufferfish larvae. Immunohistochemistry
followed, by labelling sections of pufferfish larvae with fluorescence and
observing under an all-in-one fluorescence microscope (again, if anyone would
like the complete method in detail, I can insert it in the comments). Difference
in responses of predators (expelling vs swallowing) to TTX- pufferfish and to
nontoxic organisms (medaka and Artemia
sp.) was tested by the Pearson’s Chi-square test with Yates’ continuity
correction.
In the predation experiments for T. rubripes larvae both of the predators
ingested the pufferfish larvae but spat them out immediately; similar behaviour
was observed in the predators for T.
niphobles larvae. Negative control prey (Artemia sp. and medaka larvae) revealed significant differences between
the responses of predators to that of the TTX-pufferfish. LC-MSMS analysis revealed very small amounts
of TTX in the egg and larvae of T.
niphobles, and T. rubripes,
suggesting that the amount of TTX in the pufferfish larvae does not constitute
a lethal dose to the juvenile predator fish. However, the results suggest that
the predators can sense even trace amounts of TTX in the larval pufferfish. Itoi
et al., (2014) summarised that the female parent transfers TTX vertically to
the eggs and larvae from the ovaries suggesting beneficial strategies for
increasing the survival of egg and larvae in pufferfish. Itoi et al., (2014)
went on to conclude that in a natural environment, it is easy to imagine rapid
speciation of Takifugu could be a consequence of TTX, however, despite the
toxicity of the pufferfish; overfishing is still an issue and can cause major
decline in stocks.
Itoi, S., Yoshikawa, S., Asahina, K., Suzuki,
M., Ishizuka, K., Takimoto, N., Mitsuoka, R., Yokoyama, N., Detake, A.,
Takayanagi, C., Eguchi, M., Tatsuno, R., Kawane, M., Kokubo, S., Takanashi, S.,
Miura, A., Suitoh, K., Takatani, T., Arakawa, O., Sakakura, Y., Sugita, H., 2014. Larval puffer fish protected by maternal
tetrodotoxin. Toxicon. 78, 35-40.
Hi Dean,
ReplyDeleteIs there also any horizontal transfer of the TTX in pufferfish - I assume so, as you mentioned that TTX is ingested? Also where abouts is the TTX found in other animals? Is it present in such large amounts then the pufferfish that it could be harmful for humans?
Thanks :)
Hi Tabea, answer to your last question; there has been reports of TTX poisoning in humans and I believe there have been cases of death in the past. Despite this, it is still considered a delicacy to this day. With regards to where TTX are specifically in other species, I am not sure entirely. I do know however, the amounts compared to that of the pufferfish are relatively small. TTX is transferred horizontally as revealed in this paper as it was previously believed that the TTX was solely ingested. However, the amounts are minuscule (enough to be a survival strategy however) in the first instance and then accumulates throughout its life history.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments :)