Traditionally, microbial communities were assumed to be unaffected by increases in sea surface temperature (SST) but increasing evidence is challenging this view. Much of this was down to a lack of historical data, which has subsequently left a gap between the longer term effects of sea surface warming and the abundance of microbial communities. A study by Vezzulli et al., (2012) overcame this problem by using retrospective molecular analysis of the bacterial communities sampled with the Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) to examine the long term effects of ocean warming on the abundance of Vibrio bacteria in the North Sea.
Figure
1:
A summary of the methods used in Vezzulli et
al., (2012). The sample sites taken from between 1961-2005 in the Rhine and
Humber estuaries and the Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) tow are shown in (a), with the silk cutting, sample
processing, DNA extraction and analysis summarised in (b-e). This allows the calculation of the relative abundance of Vibrio spp. cells within the sample.
CPR samples provided historical data on planktonic and
microbial communities, from the Rhine and the Humber estuaries in August between
1961 and 2005, coupled with SST time-series data for these locations. DNA was
extracted from the filtering silks of the CPR and analysed using molecular and
pyrosequencing analysis to assess the presence and relative abundance of Vibrio species. The methods are summarised
in figure 1. Despite the potential pitfalls of recovering and analysing genomic
DNA from formalin-preserved samples, this study used a modified extraction and
purification method to salvage the DNA from the CPR silks. Taxon data was
normalised across the different years. This allowed for differences in absolute
operational taxonomic units (OTU) read counts due to degradation from age and
formalin preservation. Analysis focused on the Alphaproteobacteria and the Gammaproteobacteria, both of which are abundant
in seawater and considered to be unlikely sources of contamination in the lab.
Statistical analysis of Vibrio and copepod abundance in CPR samples combined with SST data showed
that SST accounted for 45% of the variance in Vibrio data, emphasising the strong link between surface warming and
an increased abundance in Vibrio species in the North Sea since 1961. There was
a significant positive correlation between the increase in abundance of Vibrio species and increased SST in the
Rhine estuary but not the Humber. It was believed that the SST in the Humber did
not exceed 18 °C during the sampling period, which
would explain this result, as Vibrio
spp. normally thrive above this temperature. Additionally, the analysis showed
that there had been a distinct ecological regime shift in the late 1980s,
whereby Vibrio species became both
more abundant and increasingly dominant within plankton communities in the
North Sea. This shift was associated with increased penetration of warmer
Atlantic water into the North Sea.
This study has helped highlight the impact of SST on the
diversity of bacterial communities associated with plankton on a longer time scale
via a retrospective sampling method. This is crucial for understanding the risk
to human health with future warming. One issue I do have is that the authors selected
to display the pyrosequencing data for the years 1961, 1972, 1976, 1998 and
2004, leaving a big gap between 1976 and 1998. The ecological regime shift
happened between those years so one or two additional year samples may have
helped clarify exactly how this shift in bacterial diversity occurred.
Reference: Vezzulli, L., Brettar, I., Pezzati, E., Reid,
P.C., Höfle, M.G. and Pruzzo, C. (2012) Long-term effects of ocean warming on the
prokaryotic community: evidence from the vibrios, The ISME Journal, 6,
21-30.
Hi Anita, really interesting read- and really surprised it has not been done before as the CPR really does hold an important historical reservoir of information! did they mention anything about doing any other tests with the samples? So did they find most of the Vibrio sp. on copepod surfaces? Also did they not know which species of Vibrio there were- as this could lead to better ideas what diseases will thrive and what ones we wont have to worry much about. Thanks :)
ReplyDeleteHi Elyssa
ReplyDeleteYes exactly, the CPR is such a fantastic data set but I guess most people linked it with zooplankton and didn’t necessarily associate it with bacteria. Against the abundance of Vibrio spp., they superimposed the relative abundance of both phytoplankton and copepods between 1961 to 2005. There was a significant relationship between copepod abundance and Vibrio spp. abundance. It wasn’t stated how the Vibrios were interacting with the copepods but all of the material would have been caught up on the silks of the CPR so it might have been difficult to disentangle who was attached to who! They didn’t look at salinity data which was a shame as Vibrio bacteria are often found in lower salinity water such as estuaries. The Vibrio spp. weren’t stated however, the authors did focus on the abundance of one important species in the samples which was Vibrio cholerae. Other studies had recorded the presence of V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus in the Baltic and North Sea in response to an increase of wound infections and food poisoning in 2006. This study didn’t state whether these were present in the samples or not but V. cholerae definitely was. Hope this helps
Hi Anita- yes so true, maybe more use will come of it now! Ah I seee- they didn't find a relationship between phytoplankton and Vibrio sp. then? Yes I agree with how hard it would be to disentangle- an electron scanning technique to see this attachment would be so interesting to look into. Thanks for answering all my questions :)
ReplyDeleteHi Elyssa there was a relationship between phytoplankton and Vibrio spp. but not as strong as between copepod abundance and abundance of Vibrio spp. Glad that answers your questions :)
DeleteHi Anita,
ReplyDeleteA really interesting post! Out of interest what modifications did they make to the purification and extraction process in order to make it work? I was really amazed that the CPR data could be used in such a way, I would have thought it would be horribly degraded and contaminated, really highlights how resilient DNA can be under curtain circumstances.
Hi Tom
ReplyDeleteMany thanks, yes they appeared to have used a modified protocol which enabled them to analyse DNA that had been stored for 50 years. They looked at DNA within the 200-800 bp range from the older samples and first assessed the suitability by doing some PCR trials. They did not extract DNSA using the standard Proteinase K-phenol method. Instead they removed the formalin from the samples using centrifugation then added an additional chloroform:isoamyl alcohol stage to extract the DNA. This removed the residual formalin and phenol which would have interfered with the DNA extraction and enzyme-based molecular analysis. I think that this new methodology could be potentially invaluable in analysing historical samples that had previously been dismissed as being too contaminated for analysis.