Apart from corals, seagrass meadows
are a crucial component of reef ecosystems (fish nurseries, nutrient cyclers,
organic carbon producers and sediment stabilisers). Similar to corals, seagrasses are colonised by microorganisms that form
epiphytic biofilms on the leaves. Therefore a seagrass plant and its epiphytic
biofilm can be referred to as a seagrass holobiont. Ocean acidification (OA) on
corals can create changes in the composition of the microbial biofilm
associated with the coral reducing larval settlement and probably coral health.
Seagrasses, on the other hand, are generally thought to benefit from OA due to
the increased availability of CO2 and bicarbonate for photosynthesis. However,
data on how the epiphytic biofilm on seagrass leaves might respond to OA and on
the behaviour of the seagrass holobiont in future OA scenarios are still sparse.
Here Hassenrück et al, (2015) studied the epiphytic
biofilm on the leaves of the seagrass Enhalus acroides at a natural CO2
vent (pH values of 7.8) and a control site (pH values of 8.3) in Papua New Guinea.
18S ribosomal DNA sequences were used to make sure that all the seagrass shoots
collected were of the same species. The leaf age was taken into consideration;
carbon content of the seagrass leaves decreased with leaf age from
approximately 33% to 26%. Epiphyte cover increased with leaf age.
High
taxonomic resolution provided by 16S and 18S amplicon sequencing showed that
epiphyte communities seemed to be as diverse at the vent site than at the
control site. Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) identified bacterial and eukaryotic
operational taxonomic units (OTU). Overall the
results show that bacterial and eukaryotic epiphytes formed distinct
communities at the CO2-impacted site compared to the control site.This study went into a lot of
depth on what type of bacteria was found and why, which was really interesting
to read. For example OA seemed to decrease cyanobacterial abundance and
diversity in microbial films. Also Reinekea, a genus of the
Gammaproteobacteria, was mentioned to may play an important role in the
degradation of organic matter after phytoplankton blooms. It had a reduced
abundance at the vent site, which may have been caused by the decreased
availability of degradable material presumably due to the lower percentage of
epiphyte cover (which was also looked at). This study may of actually bought to light microbial organsisms, previously not considered in OA research.
Their biggest finding was that they
detected an increased prevalence of microbial sequence types associated with
coral diseases (Fusobacteria, Thalassomonas [white plague-like disease]) at the vent site under elevated pCO2 conditions
whereas eukaryotes such as certain coralline algae commonly related to healthy
reefs were less diverse (which is no surprise!). This agrees with the hypothesis that coral reefs
experiencing elevated pCO2 levels will be more susceptible to
diseases than reefs not yet exposed to OA. It further highlights the potential
of seagrasses as vectors of coral pathogens and stresses the point that
seagrasses should be viewed as a holobiont when making predictions about OA
effects and ecological consequences in coral reefs.
Can be found at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.12282/abstract
This is really interesting, did they say anything about the diversity of the bacterial community associated with the seagrasses increasing or decreasing?
ReplyDeleteYeah, really relevant as well-a previously overlooked phenomena. As mentioned the diversity seemed to be as diverse at the vent site as the control site. I gathered the loose term 'seemed' was used due to maybe the lack of data to confirm this. They didn't actually say how many samples were taken (no methods mentioned)-maybe due to the journal format.
ReplyDeleteOh right. I agree seemed is maybe a bit loose esp as you mention they talk a lot about the type bacteria etc surely they must be able to look at alpha and beta diversity. The reason I asked was because corals at vent sites show a severe reduction in their microbial community - yet can still survive in conditions previously thought to dissolve them. Just wandered if this was the case of seagrasses - apparently not.
ReplyDeleteSeagrass holobionts react pretty differently to coral holobionts under OA. So the coral itself of the microbial community can survive under conditions thought to dissolve them? How do they manage this? Thanks :)
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you've heard of the predictions for next century, where OA acidification will be sufficient to dissolve organisms with Calcium carbonate shells - yet these same concentrations are found at CO2 seeps in Papua - and there are still coral living there - my strong faith in microbes makes me think they have something to do it with it - such as described in the probiotic hypothesis by Rosenberg and colleagues.
ReplyDeleteI have also read that microbial communities have been seen to not significantly change when exposed to low pH. Yeah really good point-maybe the microbes form a kind of mucile barrier to protect them. I can't think of anything physiologically they can do as it is the outside structure thats causing the problems. Any ideas on how the microbes can protect the corals from OA? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteHi Elyssa,
ReplyDeleteI found your comment about the reduction of cyanobacterial abundance and diversity in response to OA rather thought provoking. Is this a general response by the cyanobacteria as a whole, or merely those associated with biofilms?
Taking in to account their role in oxygen supply, and the observed reductions in response to OA, can we expect increases in the prevalence of hypoxia?
Thanks,
Jack
Hi Jack. These are those associated with the microbial biofilm. It is thought that in complex assemblages, such as those seen in this study, cyanobacteria are supposed to benefit less from OA than other photosynthetic organisms such as chlorophytes, and may be outcompeted by them. I am not sure hypoxia will be prevalent as it seems like there will just be a shift in algae species...Thanks for the question.
ReplyDelete