Corals are reef building animals
that are inhabited by bacteria, fungi and archeae. The microbes can live within
the coral in their tissue or the skeleton or on their surfaces within mucus.
This association allows that corals colonized different habitats. Corals are
exposed to changes e.g. in temperature and have to deal with diseases like the
white band or the white plague disease. They are caused by microbes but it is
hard to identify the causal agents. This study by Chu & Vollmer (2016) aims
to indentify bacterial species that are associated with healthy corals and how
specific these relationships are. They studied the changes in coral microbiomes
over time and space by analysing 16S rRNA from coral-associated bacterial
communities. Chu & Vollmer used 100 coral colonies near Bocas del Toro,
Panama. The samples were taken from Acropora
cervicornis, A. palmata, Diploira labyrinthiformis, D. Strigosa, Porites
astreoides and P. furcata in December,
April and October 2012-2013.
The results show that the bacterial community
composition within the corals depends mostly on coral host species while site
and time are less important. Furthermore, the phylogeny of the corals is
reflected by the similarity of the composition of their associated bacteria.
Chu & Vollmer found that Acropora spp. incorporate high
abundances of Campylobacteraceae which are associated with the white band and
white plague disease in Monastrea spp.
That leads to the conclusion that healthy corals of one species can host
potentially pathogenic microbes.
The core microbiomes seem to be
shared between the species. Campylobacteraceae and Endozoicimonaceae were found
as the core microbiomes in Acropora. Porites were dominated by Endozoicimonaceae
and Gammaproteobacteria while Dilpoira
showed high abundances of Alteromonadales. The dominant phylum in the OTU’s are
Proteobacteria with high abundances of the order Flavobacteriales,
Alteromonadales, Oceanospirillaler and Burkholderiales. Thus, the core microbiome
‘includes shared and host-specific bacterial phylotypes’ (Chu & Vollmer,
2016).
All in all this study shows the
complexity of corals and their symbionts and provides information about potential
coral pathogens that are incorporated in healthy species which do not seem to
be effected by the pathogens. Furthermore the colonizing bacteria seem to have
different niches and nutrient demands and are therefore found in different
coral species and are host specific.
In my opinion this study is a base
for further research on identifying the potential pathogens for a better
understanding of coral diseases and their mechanisms. The methodology part is
missing and at some points it is not clear what the authors aim to state.
Additionally, it might be easier to split up the results and discussion part
and not to put all together like Chu & Vollmer did. It would be interesting
to see how the bacteria found in the corals effect their hosts and to know more
about their ecological function. Last but not least I would like to see how
global warming effects the pathogens in the healthy coral hosts and if they can
become pathogenic for their hosts, too.
Reviewed paper:
Chu, N. D., & Vollmer, S. V.
(2016). Caribbean corals house shared and host-specific microbial symbionts
over time and space. Environmental microbiology reports.
Hi Eleni,
ReplyDeleteThis is a really great paper you've found. I think it's really important to ascertain the healthy microbiota of a coral holobiont, as well as it' pathogenic microbes; as together, we can record and measure the shifts within the microbiome. This paper highlights some similar points to Tout et al., (2015) - a paper which was covered in one of the first seminars; with both papers highlighting Oceanspiralles as being a 'healthy associated' bacteria within the holobiont.
You've mentioned global warming towards the end, which makes me wonder what temperature this experiment was carried out? Was it in-situ, and just ambient temperature? Or where coral nubbins taken back to a lab and further experiments carried out? The Tout et al., (2015) paper recorded the shifts in bacterial communities using increasing temperatures; maybe this will be of interest to you?
Thanks,
Harriet
Hi Harriet,
ReplyDeleteAs I mentioned in the review the methodology part is missing. I don't know at which temperature this study was conducted. I've looked for the methods part but did not anything.
Sorry, that I cannot answer your question!
Eleni
Hi Eleni,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very intresting subject.
You said that the healthy microbiome of one coral species can harbour potential pathogens of other species. I was wondering do Acropora spp. and Monastrea spp. occur in the same habitat? Or in other words, if Monastrea spp. might be infected by Campylobacteracere which are excreted from Acropora spp.?
Thanks,
Johanna
Hi Johanna,
DeleteI am not entirely sure but I think that they occur in the same habitat. I searched with web of science and google scholar and did not find an evidence that they really occur in the same habitat.
The authors of the paper I reviewed did not mention anything else than that one species can function as a host for pathogens without being infected.
Maybe they only wanted to say that it is possible that pathogens are host specific but can also colonize other species without being harmful.
They are not really clear, so this is only my interpretation and suggestion.
Eleni