Avian cholera is an infectious disease of birds caused by
the bacterium Pasteurella multocida. The
current understanding of avian cholera in the marine environment is unclear,
with transmission pathways similar to human cholera, such as consumption of
contaminated water or food, or inhalation of bacteria-laden aerosols. However
unlike human cases scavenging of infected carcasses may also be another
important yet understudied avenue of transmission.
Observations by workers on vessels and oil platforms
reported seabird mortality to the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative (CWHC)
who initiated the study. Bird Carcasses were opportunistically collected off
Eastern Canada around 300–400 km off the coast of the island of Newfoundland. Tissue
samples from all birds were taken for bacteriologic analysis. Bacteria were
then identified based on selective growth, colony morphology, Gram stain, and
biochemical characteristics. Further histological tests were carried out on
carcasses submitted individually and well-preserved carcasses from multiple
specimen. Species were diagnosed as either having confirmed or probable avian
cholera infections based on their decomposition state.
Various carcasses were found to be infected including a
range of gull species and one raven. The first infected gull carcass was
collected early January 2007, with continued mortality occurring until the
final confirmed cases in mid-march 2007. In total 136 carcasses over 10 species
were analysed for avian cholera, with 103/136 being scavenging gulls. P.
multocida was isolated from 77 carcasses, 38 of which underwent comprehensive
necropsy with 25/38 confirmed to have avian cholera. 24 of these confirmed
infections were species of gulls. Along with the confirmed cases of Avian
Cholera there were 60 probable infections with gull species making up 53 of
them.
The outbreak studied by Wille et al. is the first known outbreak of avian cholera in a pelagic
environment. This occurrence of avian cholera also seems to have been contained
within scavenging populations, possibly indicating that scavenging individuals were
important in transmission, perpetuation, and spread of the outbreak.
Evidence of scavenging based transmission was found during
initial necropsies. A large majority of the confirmed cases had evidence of
feather shafts found in their ventricular (i.e., gizzard) lumen. Analysing the
population dynamics of the infected area, it became apparent that there was a
clear bias towards the mortality of large scavenging gulls as despite large
populations of colonial or water fowl there were no individuals diagnosed with
avian cholera.
Understanding avian cholera outbreak dynamics is essential
to understand the mechanisms that drive the spread of the disease, allowing us
to formulate successful strategies to manage future outbreaks. This is
especially important due to the heightened public health and food security
concern that are linked with contagious disease, as local arctic communities
often rely on marine species for food.
The complexities associated with tracking an outbreak became
apparent throughout the study, with possible underestimations of the true
extent of the mortalities, due to the isolated nature of the outbreak. Along
with an inherent bias due to observation errors, a characteristic trait of
outbreak investigation. This bias is covered by McClintock et al. 2010. To
amend this bias and assess avian cholera dynamics adequately a more targeted
approach is needed in future studies.
Edit: To make the results a bit cleared I reworded them here, if anybody is confused by the in-Text Results.
"In total there were 136 carcasses submitted, with 77 coming back positive with P. multocida. However, there were 25 confirmed cases and 60 probable cases, equaling 85 cases. This 85 cases is higher than the No. carcasses
with P. multocida because histology was not carried out on specimens due to carcass decomposition."
References:
Wille, M., McBurney, S., Robertson, G., Wilhelm, S., Blehert, D., Soos, C., Dunphy, R. and Whitney, H. (2016). A PELAGIC OUTBREAK OF AVIAN CHOLERA IN NORTH AMERICAN GULLS: SCAVENGING AS A PRIMARY MECHANISM FOR TRANSMISSION?. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 52(4), pp.793-802.
Hey Stefan,
ReplyDeleteAnother really interesting blog post. You've mentioned that the gulls studied were either found to have confirmed cholera (25) or probable cholera (60); does this mean that non of the bird-carcasses found were free of cholera/probable cholera? Its fascinating how gulls seem to be the focal vector? Do you think this could be because the island which was sampled has high densities of gulls in comparison to other bird species; or maybe it reflects the ruthless scavenging nature of gulls, and thus they have higher levels of accumulation?
Thanks,
Harriet
Hi Harriet,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the question, Sorry I didn't make the final carcass count very clear in the original post. (I even had to look it up again myself).
In total there were 136 carcasses submitted, with 77 coming back positive with P. multocida. However, there were 25 confirmed cases and 60 probable cases, equaling 85 cases. This 85 cases is higher than the No. carcasses
with P. multocida because histology was not carried out on specimens due to carcass decomposition.
For a a carcass to be a probable cholera diagnosis, P. multocida didn't have to be isolated from it, just possessing gross legions similar to that seen in the confirmed cases.
During the study, population analysis was carried out on local birds, which showed that there were many colonial bird as well as water fowl in the area. Despite the enhanced public awareness of avian cholera in the region, no reports of sick and dying waterfowl or waterfowl carcasses were reported. Leading myself and the authors to believe that scavenging behaviors may have been important for sustaining the the outbreak.
Hope this asked your question, if it didn't or you have another please feel free to reply!
Thanks,
Stefan
Hey Stefan,
ReplyDeleteYou have answered my question, thanks!
Harriet
Hi Stefan, interesting topic it’s nice to hear that the study was initiated due to observations local workers had reported to CWHC. As you mentioned understanding the mechanism that spreads avian cholera is essential to find ways to reduce future breakouts, did the authors suggest any future management strategies in light of the findings or do you have any suggestions?
ReplyDeleteThanks
Alisha
Hi Alisha,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the question! The authors didn't actually mention any techniques for limiting future outbreaks, however they made sure that they contributed to the future of diagnosing Avian Cholera.
When diagnosing avian cholera a large part of it is looking for lesions and their specific properties within the carcass. Since several of the gull species involved in this outbreak hadn't been recorded with avian cholera before, the recording of legion properties is essential to provide detailed diagnostic information. If Avian cholera continues to emerge in the Arctic, recognition of these lesions in any future mortality events could assist in making a preliminary diagnosis of avian cholera.
I know this isn't exactly what you were looking for but there have been a few other authors that have gone into Avian Disease prevention. There isn't a huge amount on avian cholera, but the H1N1 strain received a lot more scientific attention, leading to more reading material.
ALDERS, R. and BAGNOL, B. (2007). Effective communication: the key to efficient HPAI prevention and control. World's Poultry Science Journal, 63(01), pp.139-147.
Sorry I couldn't answer your question directly.
Thanks,
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
DeleteThanks for taking the time to reply, as you mentioned although the authors didn't mention any future ways to control the spread of any future outbreaks the background and awareness from the study as you mentioned will help with diagnosis so that controls may be put in place quicker
I looked over the paper you mentioned and I found it really interesting how cultural differences can lead to differences in understanding how disease is spread in populations and how essential communication is to ensure people understand how to reduce the spread of the disease and although it doesn't necessary help to control the spread in the avian populations it can help reduce the impacts on human health something that was highlighted as being important in the paper.
Thanks
Alisha
Hi Stefan,
ReplyDeleteA very interesting post, i was unaware that this was such a great problem before this, I was wondering how this avian cholera is linked to cholera that humans can have. Is it the same virus or is a slightly different strain?
Thanks Natasha