Saturday, 3 December 2016

How increased ocean acidification may remove the positive impact the mud shrimp has on the nitrogen cycle

Within the past 200 years due to increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, the pH of the ocean’s surface water has decreased by 0.1 units to an average of pH 8.10, worryingly by the end of the Century its predicated to decrease by an additional 0.3 - 0.5 units increasing ocean acidification.

In light of this there have been few studies that have investigated the impacts of ocean acidification on microbial processes, It is assumed that the nitrogen cycle will be particular susceptible to this decrease in pH due to the reduction of ammonia oxidation rates. Sediments are important sites for microbial driven transformation of nitrogen. A study by Laverock (2013) looks at the effects ocean acidification may have on ammonia oxidation rates in sediment, the authors also looks at how sediment in borrows produced from bioturbation may be impacted, This is important because bioturbation from organism may play a big role in nitrification processes for example the large, semi-permanent burrows of the mud shrimp U.deltaurais support bacterial communities that are distinct with a higher diversity than, the surrounding surface and subsurface sediment. Importantly the presence of U.deltaurais has been shown to increase threefold the rates of denitrification within sediment therefore having an impact on the ecosystem functioning.


Methods
·         Manipulative experiments were used for a period of 14 weeks to look at ocean acidification on benthic ammonia oxidation rates in the overlying water surface, surface sediment and sediment in burrows there were 4 target treatments  pH 7.90, 7.70,7.35 and 6.8 and one control of pH 8.10
·         Sediment was collected using a box core and used in the experiment there was a 9 week settling period to allow shrimps to establish their burrows and to also allow microbial communities to regain their spatial structure after sediment disturbance this was important because it allowed conditions to occur to what is more representative of the natural environment.
·         To measure microbial gene abundance q-PCR assays was performed to both quantify bacteria and archaeal 16S rRNA and amoA genes
·         The pH of the mud shrimp’s haemolymph was measured to allow acidosis to be measured.
                                                                                                                                            
Findings
As expected ammonia oxidation rates in the overlying water decreased with reduced pH, however within surface sediments, there was no significant effect of pH on ammonia oxidation rates interestingly within burrow wall sediments, ammonia oxidation rates decreased by 80% from pH 8.10 to 7.90 followed by a further 83% between pH 7.90 and 7.70. However at pH 7.70 to 6.80 the ammonia oxidation became lower than in the surface sediment, this is important to mention because at pH 8.10 burrow wall rates were, on average, five times higher than surface rates showing that ocean acidification has a negative impact of the rates in borrows. Due to increased acidic conditions the two shrimps in the lowest pH treatment 6.80 and one form pH 7.35 were unable to survive the conditions highlighting the physiological stress the change in conditions caused an interesting finding that in the borrow treatment pH 6.8 although the ammonia oxidation rates were well below that of the control there was no significant different between the burrow sediment and the surface sediment and the rate had actually increased indicating that relicts structures still continue to act as important sites for biogeochemical cycling through passive flushing of the borrow. Since the burrow sediment increased in ammonia oxidation rates in the absence of mud shrimp its suggested that the change in behaviour of the mud shrimp induced by pH changes may alter the phsico-chemical conditions within the burrow reducing the rate of ammonia oxidation at low pH.

Even Though Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene abundances increased significantly with a reduction in pH the results suggested that on the contrary archaeal cell-specific ammonia oxidation rates actually decreased at low pH. Indicating that there is higher inactivity in the AOA possible explanation of this is that pH directly affects enzyme activity, Chemolithoautotrophic nitrification is also an energetically expensive process  meaning that bacteria and archaea may find the conditions to stressful to actively uptake ammonium in low pH. There were limitations of the PCR primers used, The primers used only targeted betaproteobacterial ammonia oxidizers. Although Gammaproteobacterial AOB have been detected in low abundance within the water column they may conversely be widespread in marine sediments. It is also likely that some member of the community for both AOB and AOA, are missed by the use of single amoA primer sets.

This paper provides a good starting point, however to obtain a more detailed picture of how ocean acidification may affect ammonia oxidation rates a limiting factor in the nitrogen cycle, a number of factors still require further study including identifying if the decline in ammonia oxidation rates in reduced pH is due to decline in cell activity due to physiologically stress of alternately an shift in the active members of the microbial community. Species interactions should also be considered, although it appears ocean acidification may have a negative effect on mud shrimp other bioturbating species may benefit from increased acidified conditions especially due to decreased competition from other species.


Laverock, B., Kitidis, V., Tait, K., Gilbert, J., Osborn, A. and Widdicombe, S. (2013). Bioturbation determines the response of benthic ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms to ocean acidification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1627), pp.20120441-20120441.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Alisha,
    You mentioned that there was no change in ammonia oxidation in the surface sediments, do you think that this is largely due to bioturbation of other macrofauna, or do you think that there could be a high stability of the bacterial communities?
    I have attached an interesting paper which assess the effect of ocean acidification on the sediment microbial communities, they use naturally CO2 rich areas and have determined big community shifts. Although it is not bioturbation related i feel that it might answer so of the question that your reviewed paper puts forward.
    Thanks
    Natasha-lea
    Hassenrück, C., Fink, A., Lichtschlag, A., Tegetmeyer, H. E., de Beer, D., & Ramette, A. (2016). Quantification of the effects of ocean acidification on sediment microbial communities in the environment: The importance of ecosystem approaches. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(5), fiw027. doi:10.1093/femsec/fiw027

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Natasha, thanks for your question, the authors did find there was no change in ammonia oxidation in the surface sediment because this experiment was lab based, mud shrimp were the only macrofauna present in the treatments and so the effects of other bioturbating macrofuana did not occur. The second point you made about the high stability of the bacterial communities could be a reason for there being no difference. The authors did mention two possible explanations firstly the dissolution of carbonate mineral within the sediment may act to buffer the pore water pH, this buffering may reduce the effect of ocean acidification, the second explanation links to your point that a change in the structure of the nitrifying communities may occur in the sediment with the community shifting to bacteria or archaea that are more tolerant of lower pH conditions. From further information the authors mentioned that previous studies looking at the long term effects (more than 20 weeks) of reduced pH in heart urchin the sediment profiles overtime are significantly altered by reduced pH. Highlighting that pH buffering alone may not provide a full explanation it would be interesting to see if the combination of pH buffering and the microbial community can provide an explanation.

      The paper that you mention was helpful. I think it seems to have helped remove a lot of the previous issues of conflicting results by taking into account environmental characterization something that was not previously considered in the majority of papers many of the previous studies also had sample sizes that were not large enough leading to further problems and resulting in deviating results between papers. It was also interesting to read a paper that investigated the effects of ocean acidification in the field by looking at naturally CO2-rich sites it was highlighted that this was not without problems many of the naturally CO2-rich sites investigated were associated with hydrothermal activity this introduces many confounding factors which make it harder to see the exact impact of reduce pH, I think this can be linked back Laverock’s paper as the authors mentioned that the effects of sediment type and seasonality could be considered for the effects they may have on the impact of reduced pH. Because the Laverock study was lab based it was interested to gain more insights into studies that have been conducted in the field and factors that may need to be considered and could provide explanations for differences which may occur if further studies were conducted in the field.

      Delete
  2. Hi Alisha, i found this very useful, i understand that there is some major limitations with this being a lab study and i think that we should be weary of extrapolating this in to the natural ecosystem although it does give a simplified version of what may occur in the ecosystem.
    Yes i agree i feel as lab studied need to be read alongside field studies and this can solidify our lab findings.
    Thanks
    Natasha

    ReplyDelete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.