Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide are created
through the reduction of molecular oxygen to water and play a critical role in
coral bleaching. The internal accumulation of Superoxide have previously been
linked to physiological stress. The build-up of these toxic chemicals within
the coral are thought to damage the photosynthetic capability of Symbiodinium
cells and impair mitochondrial electron transport in the coral host. This
eventually leads to the expulsion of the algae companions, resulting in the
loss of coral colour, energy production and organic carbon.
Previously, internal superoxide has been considered a
detrimental molecule, however newly discovered pathways and sources of
superoxide have revealed that a diverse group of heterotrophic bacteria
enzymatically produce extracellular superoxide at the corals surface. Unlike
the traditional detrimental effects of having intercellular superoxide,
external production may aid the corals resilience to disease and increase
thermotolerance.
Despite the bad reputation of superoxide, very little is
known about the origins, distributions and ecological underpinning of
superoxide production in natural coral communities. Previous studies utilized
indirect evidence of oxidative stress based on observations, gene expression
and proteomics resulting in often inaccurate and biased results. However Diaz
et al. utilized recent developments in non-invasive chemiluminescent techniques
allowing the team to capture the first in-situ measurements of external
superoxide production by several species of thermally stressed and bleaching
corals.
Observations during a bleaching event saw corals that were
susceptible to bleaching lacked the production of external superoxide, while
resistant corals had high concentrations of external superoxide. Additional
observations were also carried out on corals that weren’t undergoing physiological
stress, these corals still carried out the production of superoxide. These
findings were then reinforced by a parallel study which examined corals in a
lab environment. The combination of these results has resulted in scientists
realizing that superoxide may be vitally misunderstood and instead of a being a
detrimental molecule, it may be an essential molecule for the well-being of
coral. Future lab experiments are essential for investigating the relationship
between superoxide and physiological stressors without the natural variability
of the coral reef. Focus should also be directed to the handful of other stressors
corals experience such as pathogens.
The measurement of superoxide isn’t without its hardships,
due to the volatile 30 second lifespan of superoxide, even these successful
measurements shown will be seeded with unavoidable bias. However the research team
have carving their way through previous bias methodologies and unreliable data
using novel techniques to reveal important discoveries that go against the
grain of studies on the area. This initial discovery may lead to future research
that is essential to achieve a better understanding of the physiology of
corals, leading us towards future developments in coral management and help
develop bleaching mitigation strategies.
Diaz, J., Hansel, C., Apprill, A., Brighi, C., Zhang, T., Weber,
L., McNally, S. and Xun, L. (2016). Species-specific control of external
superoxide levels by the coral holobiont during a natural bleaching event. Nature
Communications, 7, p.13801.
Hi Stefan,
ReplyDeleteDid the authors mention anything about the coral species on which they have found these superoxide-producing bacteria? I think that it would be really interesting to investigate if there is any difference between the species and the habitats they were found in.
Thanks,
Eleni
Hi Eleni,
ReplyDeleteYes they did look at a handful of different species to see the variation in superoxide production relative to the susceptibility of to bleaching. However i'm not entirely sure what you are asking with your question.
Sorry,
Stefan