Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Life After Death for Tubeworm Endosymbionts

Riftia pachyptila, better known as tubeworms, are deep sea invertebrates that live in symbiosis with what seems to be a single species of symbiotic bacteria: Candidatus Endoriftia persephone, better known as Endoriftia, that live in a specially created organ in the tubeworm called a trophosome. While the worm is alive, it provides these Endoriftia with substrates for chemosynthesis (the fixation of 1-carbon compounds into organic carbon using chemical energy) and in return the symbiont gives the host organic carbon. But what happens when the worm dies? The general consensus was that the symbionts die too, but how can this be when this symbiosis has lasted for so long? This study by Klose et al. investigates the fate of the symbionts once the tubeworm has died.

The researchers found that 97% of the endosymbionts in their experimental setup did in fact escape the dead tubeworm tissue in a process similar to how they initially enter the host (through the skin); estimating 7 million symbionts released per 10 dead worms, though this is an interesting figure as later in the paper it is stated that 3g of trophosome in a 20g tubeworm can house 1.11x10^10 symbionts, what is causing this loss? Potentially autolytic enzymes or loss of symbionts that are not able to pass back through the skin of the worm. Furthermore, the symbiont metagenome revealed the capacity for flagellar motility. I wonder if these Endoriftia are able to leave their host pre-death should conditions become unfavourable to them, similar to a coral bleaching event.

Though they live in symbiosis, Endoriftia are also able to live in a planktonic state, but the distance to travel to a new hydrothermal vent must be unachievable for these micro-organisms. A thought of mine is that once these symbionts escape their dead host and establish a free living population, they resume chemosynthesis. This production of organic carbon might attract larger organisms or even their next host to ingest them or otherwise pick them up and carry them to another vent site. Ocean current dispersal is a much more feasible idea however.
In order to acquire the data, special recruitment plates were built with 0.4g tubeworm trophosome at the bottom and 5 glass cover slides stationed at distances away from the flesh to investigate the post-death dispersion of the Endoriftia. The plates were kept under simulated environmental conditions from where the worms were collected from and incubated for up to six days. after the experimental period and then analysed with FiSH and TEM.

We knew before that these symbionts were transmitted horizontally but this paper further shows how and on what magnitude  they are released into the environment once their host dies or can no longer provide for them, giving us insight into the life history of these symbionts and their potential impact on Carbon chemistry of the local water after their host dies.

Reference:

Klose, J. Polz, M. F. Wagner, M. Schimak, M.P. Gollner,S. and Bright, M. (2015) Endosymbionts escape dead hydrothermal vent tubeworms to enrich the free living population. PNAS, 112 (36), 11300-11305

Available at: 
http://www.pnas.org.plymouth.idm.oclc.org/content/112/36/11300.full 

3 comments:

  1. Hi Joss, interesting paper!
    I was wondering if there was any mention of the average lifespan of the Endoriftia? Also, do you think it's possible that these symbionts are more productive within their hosts than when in their free-living form?

    Thanks,
    Laura

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Laura, thanks for your question!

    The paper gives insight into how long the tubeworms colonise a location, which could be a proxy for lifespan (then again it might not), which is between 1 and 4 years in the sites studied, It might be different in other locations though. Their lifespan also depends on the productivity of the vent; if the vent moves or stops (due to geological activity) then they will no longer be able to get the inorganic nutrients for their symbionts and die. So 1 to 4 years, but also factor in the lifespan of the hydrothermal vent.

    As for the symbionts, I should think they would be more productive in their host as they don't need to acquire nutrients, whereas once they have left the tubeworm they will have to find their own nutrients, diverging energy away from productivity. Similarly, they may not get as many nutrients as in the tubeworms so their productivity will likely be lower outside the host.

    ReplyDelete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.