The study by Escobar et al. (2015) identified significant environmental variables linked to the occurrence of V. cholerae. The oceanographic variables were used to create a model which describes potential V. cholerae distribution areas. Further, the model was applied on current and future climate scenarios.
Firstly, they performed a literature
review to accumulate all sites of V.
cholerae presence. Twelve environmental variables were taken into account
to build Environmental niche models (ENM). ENM are mathematical models which
help to predict the distribution of species in geographic space considering
their known distribution in environmental space. Principal components analysis
(PCA) and jackknife test were used to identify and evaluate highly correlated
environmental variables and their model performance.
Literature review yielded 15 sites
in marine areas with V. cholerae reports worldwide. Most significant
environmental variables which were used for the final ENM were Chlorophyll-a,
maximum temperature, pH and mean salinity. Cholorphyll-a was the most powerful
variable for explaining presence of V.
cholerae. Appearance of V. cholerae
is closely related to plankton blooms. The bacteria in estuaries and coastal
waters are associated with plankton. Increased Chlorophyll-a concentration indicates
increased potential for infection of humans.
Several regions were identified to
be suitable for V. cholerae occurrence.
Future models showed a pregnant increase of suitable regions worldwide. This
may suggest that there is a higher level of risk of V. cholerae distribution in a future of global warming.
Since this is only a model, results
of these findings have yet to be proven realistic. More information about
distribution sites and environmental variables including not only abiotic
factors, but also biotic factors are necessary to improve the model.
Although
this is not a typical hands-on research paper, I think it gives an important
overview about the future of Cholera disease. With increasing water temperature
especially in coastal regions it is important to know which areas could be populated
by the toxic bacteria in future events. Future studies should focus on the
identification of new distribution areas. Has V. cholerae already moved somewhere else? Further, migration pathways
should be more investigated to get a better picture of future spreading.
Escobar L.,
Ryan S., Ibarra A., Finkelstein J., King C., Qiao H., Polhemus M (2015), Acta Tropica. A
global map of suitability for coastal Vibrio cholerae under current and future
climate conditions. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.028
Hi Nuri,
ReplyDeleteI think this is a really interesting review, and if it is accurate, could be invaluable.
However, do you think that the 12 factors the authors used to calculate the ENM is enough? It seems like quite a low number of variables to use when there seems to be a magnitude of variables to consider. I know that there are only a certain number of things a research team can include in a single project, but for something that could potentially ease up the number of cholera cases worldwide, you would want to be as accurate as possible.
Did the authors use bacterial interactions as one of the variables for this? Like we discussed in our last lecture, interspecies interactions between bacteria seem to play a huge role in pathogenicity and a range of other bacterial behaviours, and I think this could be a really important factor when looking at how a disease as prevalent as cholera works and when trying to make predictions like this.
Good review!
Hi Laura,
ReplyDeletethanks a lot for the feedback. The 12 variables they used are more or less the most important abiotic factors affecting marine life in an ocean system. They mentioned that the variables they used are based on previous ENMs of shallow-water organisms in marine environments. Other variables I could think of are density, currents/water-movement and other nutrients such as iron. I am not sure if they could be added to the ENMs, since they are maybe not relevant to describe distribution of shallow-water organisms.
For this study the only used abiotic variables. Though, they mentioned at the end that interactions with biotic vectors such as copepods need further research, since it is known that they play a key role in disease transmission. Though, other bacteria or even zooplankton depend on abiotic factors as well. So interactions might go hand in hand depending on the variables.
I think even though they didn't include biotic factors in the ENM it is still a valid model. It's another step towards a better understanding of Cholera disease.
Cheers