Cyanobacteria is the oldest known fossil on earth. They are highly distributed in any type of environment and play a crucial role within the nitrogen cycle by fixing nitrogen from the atmosphere through photosynthesis. In the marine environment, cyanobacteria distribution seems to be concentrated around the equator with a few phylogenetic groups scattered further out towards colder waters. This global biogeographical distribution, limited by a physiologically feasible temperature range at which cyanobacteria can perform nitrogen fixation, has now been experimentally tested to help our understanding of the nitrogen cycle.
Brauer et al. (2013) used the unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium, Cyanothece, as a model organism in their very straight forward experiment which examined the reasons for limitations of fixing nitrogen in high and low temperatures. Growth rates, nitrogen fixation rates and respiration rates of batch cultures were monitored in the lab which provided evidence that in cold waters nitrogenase activity is limited to an increasing respiratory cost per molecule of fixing nitrogen. Low temperatures also delay the onset of nitrogenase activity which consequently allow the cyanobacteria even less time during the day to fix nitrogen.
Being a simple lab experiment, this study`s mechanistic explanation of temperature dependence of nitrogen fixing organisms is part of a bigger picture. Brauer et al. mentioned that their study not only explains global biogeographical distribution of Cyanothece, but it might also apply to many other nitrogen fixing unicellular cyanobacteria. Information about which role temperature plays in nitrogen fixation is particularly important as global warming is predicting an increase in water temperatures, especially in higher latitudes.
I wonder how many other organisms and processes in the ocean can influence this straight forward chemical reaction. I think this study is a constructive approach to increase our understanding of the nitrogen cycle as well as to help predict future changes. For a better understanding it would be interesting to compare cyanobacteria abundance in samples collected in different temperature ranges over the last decades. Devices such as the Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) sample zooplankton and phytoplankton and give information about geographical distribution, seasonal cycles and year-to-year changes in abundance over a large spatial area. Would it not be useful to haves something similar to the CPR for smaller organisms including unicellular cyanobacteria? Details about composition of picophytoplankton samples could then provide us with information about other limiting factors for nitrogen fixing organisms.
Cyanobacteria were playing the most important part in the oxygen revolution during the Archaean and Proterozoic Era, changing the atmosphere to a habitat more suitable for life. Present and future global warming, causing temperature increases in our oceans, seems to make conditions for cyanobacteria even more suitable. Lets hope that they still have the same intentions as 3.5 billion years ago.
Brauer V. S., Stomp M., Rosso C., van Beusekom S. AM., Emmerich B., Stal L. J. and Huisman J. (2013) Low temperature delays timing and enhances the cost of nitrogen fixation in the unicellular cyanobacterium Cyanothece. ISME Journal, 7, 2105-2115.
http://www.nature.com/ismej/journal/v7/n11/full/ismej2013103a.html
Hi Tabea, thanks for an interesting post, a good reminder of just how important the cyanobacteria are. Though they are also responsible for harmful algal blooms, do you think there would be any link between an increasing temperature and the frequency and impact of the HABs?
ReplyDeleteI was also wondering whether any work has been done looking into the potential for a piece of equipment to collect and record data on organisms such as unicellular cyanobacteria. This could be an interesting concept!
Hi Sam,
DeleteA good reminder of how important the cyanobacteria are but especially how important it is to know how they are changing with the changing world! Yes, there is definately a link between an increasing temperature and the frequency and impacts of the HABs. In fact you can already see how global warming is increasing harmful algae blooms at the moment. It is a scary thought! Anthropogenic pollution (excess nitrogen in the water) was mainly the reason for HABs so far, but what if temperature increases, favours the nitrogenase in such a way that HABs could occur anywhere where nitrogen is occuring, even with no human input?
I couldn`t find an answer to your second question so far, but I will let you know as soon as I find out.
Hi Tabea, I was wondering what is the distribution of Cyanotheca? I take it is from warmer waters, did the authors mention any experiments which compared the nitrogenase activity of Cyanobacteria species from cold and warmer waters? Presumably changes in the nitrogenase enzyme would allow an increased efficiency at colder temperatures?
ReplyDeleteHi Tom, there is nothing said in particular about the distribution of Cyanotheca. I think Cyanotheca is mainly used as a model organisms to explains the processes of nitrogenase which occur similar in all uni-cellular cyanobacteria. Cyanotheca is an example for UCYN A and B, which only occur in 20°C or above. So there is not really a cold water species used, if something like that actually exists? It seems like there are Cyanobacteria with a higher temperature range though which can also fix nitrogen in higher latitudes. I hope I could answer your questions a little bit!
DeleteHi - thanks for the post, there seems to be a cyanobacteria boom on this blog at the moment!
ReplyDeleteI was just wondering, did this study look at light intensity at all - as nitrogen fixation is a photosynthetic-dependent process, I wondered if the nitrogenase activity would change with depth as a result of light attenuation?
Thanks, Jack :D
Hi Jack,
DeleteSorry for this late reply but I only just saw your question.
Yes they did look at light intensity! A specific growth rate of Cyanothece as an increasing decelerating function of light intensity was shown, however this depended on temperature and nitrogen source! Light intensity was affecting nitrogen fixation rate throughout the day but had no seasonal effect. I am not 100% sure about this but maybe it is possible to compare seasonal differences in light with the light intensity in different depth. What are your thoughts to this?
Thanks Tabea
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete