Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are projected to
double over the next century, which is predicted to decrease seawater pH on
average by 0.3-0.4. This study showed that ocean acidification will alter the central process of the nitrogen cycle, nitrification. Nitrification produces both nitrous oxide (a greenhouse gas) and more importantly, oxidized forms of nitrogen, which is used by phytoplankton and other microorganisms in the ocean. Ammonia Oxidizing Archaea (AOA) and Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria (AOB) carry out the first stage of this process, converting ammonium into nitrite. From the results of this study it can be predicted that in 20-30 years, ammonia oxidation
rates by AOA and AOB will
decrease by 3-44% in response to the expected 0.1 decrease of seawater pH.
To make this discovery, a series of
experiments took place, each focused on a water samples taken from three
locations each simulating different pH characteristics of water masses. Samples
were taken from two oligotrophic seas and a subtropical gyre, from the
eutrophic zone. The pH exposures mimicked the average conditions expected
later this century. Rates of oxidization were measured by adding a stable
isotope tracer to the seawater samples and the accumulation of this isotope in
the oxidized product pools after incubation were calculated into rates using an
equation. Percentage changes in ammonia oxidation rates with the projected
changes in ocean pH could then be determined by using a graph.
It
is likely that the decrease in pH slowed down ammonia oxidizing rates because it affected the enzyme activity
directly by disrupting the function of ammonia mono-oxygenase, which ammonia is
transferred and broken down by. A study on confirming if this is the reason would be of great use to enable predictions of what other important enzymes in marine organisms a lowered pH could effect.
This shift in chemical forms of nitrogen
supplies to more ammonium than nitrate in the upper water column could mean nitrate
supported organisms, such as diatoms, would be at a disadvantage; therefor effecting
oceanic food webs, fisheries and carbon export to the deep sea. However, not all results would be negative,
as with the 3-44% decrease in oceanic nitrification, less nitrous oxide will be
produced, which will hopefully cushion the increased fossil fuel combustion and industry
processes effects. But it also has to be considered that along with ocean acidification, other climate change players may affect nitrifying abilities such as upper ocean temperature and oxygen concentration, which
should now also be explored. I feel that a study like this should involve a repeat mesocosm experiment using cultured AOA and BOA, run alongside the samples taken from the field. This would be of importance as differing substrate
availability, light and dissolved oxygen concentrations in the sea water samples could have affected nitrification rates seen in this study.
I think it's important to mention that the authors found that in their study AOA and AOB from regions of recorded lower pH are not immune to future acidification, as their oxidizing rates showed no different to water samples that have not been previously acclimatised to lower pH. This has even more implications that the acclimatisation ability of microbes will not be fast enough for climate change.
Beman, J. M., Chow, C. E., King, A. L., Feng, Y., Fuhrman, J. A., Andersson, A., ... & Hutchins, D. A. (2011). Global declines in oceanic nitrification rates as a consequence of ocean acidification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(1), 208-213.
Hey, this is really interesting. I was just wandering whether they used one different pH consistent at each location, or three? Also, did they address the enzyme activity, or were they hypothesising that this might of been the problem?
ReplyDeleteHi Katrina. The pH in experiments were reduced from 7.99-8.09 to 7.85-7.99, so this corresponds with what the watermass pH was originally. The pH reduction was different for each water mass, as it was representing what the pH will be expected to be in that water mass later that century. I feel this experiment was carried out very well, as they considered that all water masses will not all have the same pH change, and they took this into account very well. No they didn't test whether it was the enzyme, thats why I feel to actually investigate if it was the enzyme would be very beneficial to apply to other organisms as well. Do you agree?
ReplyDeleteThanks for clarifying the pH's they used in the experiment, it is good to see they have tried to represent different water masses and there perceived changes in pH. It would be interesting to look at how pH distrupts ammonia mono-oxygenase, I wander what led them to think it was this enzyme, but as it is specific to nitrifying bacteria, i'm not sure how it applies to other organisms. If you mean general enzyme disruption caused by pH change then yes.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYes a focused study on just ammonia mono-oxygenase would be very interesting to clarify this, as if it is not the enzyme, it would be so interesting to what it would be! I am not sure if ammonia mono- oxygenase is only specific to nitrifying bacteria as archaea also have it and I think it is found in other ammonium converting species. But yes we need to see what other key enzymes in marine organisms that pH affect.
ReplyDeleteYes your right.
ReplyDeleteNice article Elyssa
ReplyDeleteI was wondering did they mention anything about the ability of these organisms to adapt to lowered pHs due to ocean acidification? Presumably micro-organisms with a rapid generation time would be in a good position to do so even over relatively short time scales also strains which are more able to cope with lowered pH could increase in abundance. What time scale were the pH drop experiments carried over?
No they didn't mention that, like you said, as they have such a short generation time you would think they would be best suited to adapt that quickly. Yes as I have to come to realise reading more microbiological papers, strains can vary in response dramatically! Darn things! Samples from each location were exposed to decreased pH for different time exposures some at 6-14h and some for 5days.
ReplyDelete