Oil spills are a major threat to the
marine environment. The chemical components of crude oil can smother or poison
marine organisms causing great harm. Whilst these spills are detrimental to the
environment, further damage may also occur during the clean-up process due to
the invasive nature of particular cleaning techniques. This paper looks at the
clean-up operation for the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig spill of 2010 that
was the biggest accidental release of crude oil recorded to date. The majority
of the oil from this spill reaches the sandy benthic habitat that dominates
this area where microbial biofilms are situated. These biofilms are capable of
bioremediation, however there is a lack of information as to the exact microbes
that are responsible for this oil degradation within the communities. This
experiments aim was to expand on this knowledge and investigate the bioremediation
response by characterising the community structure involved with oil degradation.
Sand samples were taken from the
affected area for investigation, the microbes from which were grown using 2
methods. One of these was by traditional culturing techniques involving the use
of an artificial seawater medium, both aerobic and anaerobic, to grow a mixture
of microbes from the sampled sediment. The strains grown were then isolated on
Zobell marine agar or solidified artificial seawater medium until pure, then
phenotypically characterized using a MicroArray analysis. This method
enumerated a variety of hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms, the majority of
which were gammaproteobacteria. The most prevalent of these was Alcanivorax
spp., which were shown to have the highest MPN (most probable number) counts
and were seen to be more frequently found in visibly oil-contaminated sand
samples. As oil is a major carbon source, the overall number of microbes
increased with more contaminated samples as there was more energy readily available
for them to utilize. This is good news in terms of oil spill clean-up in this
area, as it means indigenous microbial communities are capable of reacting
quickly and efficiently to spills. Maximum abundance was shown to be at 1-2
weeks after the contamination, this proves that a natural clean-up may be the
best option for the recovery of this environment.
Of the
24 hydrocarbon degrading bacteria isolated the most effect at this site
appeared to be closely related to Alanivorax
dieslolei, with 93% oil degradation, followed by what was thought to be Acinetobacter sp. at 90%. These bacteria
seemed to be thriving rather than surviving on the oil contamination therefore,
when oil contamination was reduced, A. dieslolei
counts did also fell in number. It appeared to be less versatile than the other
gammaproteobacteria sampled.
The second method of microbe
enumeration involved molecular techniques. DNA and RNA were extracted using the
automated ribosomal intragenic spacer analysis (ARISA) method and GoScript
reverse transcriptase. These extracted samples were then sequenced using
one-step PCR and analysed in QIIME and Primer6 software to build a phylogenetic
tree. This technique allowed for a larger sample size and a quicker comparison
of species. It showed that contrary to the known culturability of bacteria,
similar numbers of oil degrading bacteria were found from both culturing and
molecular techniques. This shows potential for commercial applications of these
bacteria as they can be easily cultured in the lab and could be used as a
solution in areas of oil spill as an artificially induced bioremediation defence.
The microbe that showed the most potential of commercial use was Alanivorax dieslolei.
The Alanivorax genus was selected for specifically with these molecular
techniques and the use of a probe labelled with fluorescent dye to allow for
quantification of this already known to be hydrocarbon degrading genus. The
species though to be Alanivorax dieslolei
had the highest consumption rate and only thrives in areas of high oil
concentration, meaning it could potentially aid with the cleaning up of oil spills
without too much interference on natural populations. This is because it will
only thrive until the oil is depleted, at which point indigenous microbial
communities can return to normal function.
My personal opinion is that this
paper is only a first glance into community structure of oil spill clean ups.
New techniques such as metagenomics could provide a more substantial overview
of the populations involved at different stages of a clean-up. I believe that
this paper is a step in the right direction as understanding the way in which
the environment will recover from these events naturally will enable us to find
the best possible way to deal with them in the future.
Kostka, J. E., Prakash, O., Overholt,
W.A., Green, S. J., Freyer, G., Canion, A., Delgardio, J., Norton, N., Hazen
T.C. and Huettel M. (2011) Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria and the Bacterial
Community Response in Gulf of Mexico Beach Sands Impacted by the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Applied Environmental Microbiology 77, 22, 7963-7974.
Hi Freya,
ReplyDeleteThank you for this interesting post. It is funny as I just posted about Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria myself! As the paper you have been reviewing was published in 2011, you might have not come across this, but I just red up about how the use of bioremediation in that case of the Deepwater Horizon went a little bit wrong: The use of the artificial chemical emulsifier Corexit to enhance the physical action between bacteria and hydrocarbons increased the toxicity of the oil by 52 times after two years! I hope you will enjoy reading my post.