Methods:
Seawater
samples were collected during February and April from the L4 water sampling
station in the Western English Channel, using a mesh screen sampler to measure
assemblages to a depth of 400 μm. Plankton samples were taken from a depth of 2
m using a sampling bottle and all samples were filtered before analysis.
Protist and fungal diversity was measured using denaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis (DGGE) and high-throughput 18S rRNA gene sequencing. These are
methods for looking particular genes to identify organisms within a microbial
community.
Findings:
This
study, using 18S rRNA gene diversity assessment, indicated that many groups
were more abundant and diverse in the SML, particularly during the spring
blooms. Fungi were more abundant and diverse in the neuston layer compared to
the underlying water. The authors acknowledge that some of the fungi may be
terrestrial in origin, which is one of the issues associated with studying
marine fungi. Most of the fungal groups, however, have been previously
identified in other studies looking at fungal diversity at the L4 station. The
diversity of many protist groups was higher in the SML than the plankton. Protist
diversity also showed temporal changes, with higher diversity pre-spring bloom,
compared to April, during the spring bloom. Some protist groups in the neuston
layer, such as diatoms, were distinct from assemblages in the plankton. Many
groups of fungi and protists dominated the SML in February and April,
coinciding with the spring bloom. This links in with previous work at the L4
station which showed that major groups of phytoplankton followed a seasonal
cycle of abundance.
This
study is a valuable addition to work concerning fungal and protist diversity in
other regions around the world. Still little is known about the diversity of
these groups in marine habitats, their seasonal fluctuations or their impact
upon biogeochemical cycles. One criticism I would have is that this paper isn’t
divided into sections such as methods, introduction, discussion etc. which
makes it difficult to read, though this may be the publisher’s requirement. An
extension to this study could include a more extensive look at how the
abundance of protist and fungal groups changes throughout the year to provide a
more complete picture of how these change seasonally.
Taylor, J.D. and Cunliffe,
M. (2014) High-throughput sequencing reveals neustonic and planktonic microbial
eukaryote diversity in coastal waters, Phycological
Society of America, 50, 960-965.
Hi Anita,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your sentiments that the paper is difficult to navigate! Your article was helpful in condensing some complicated reading into an easy one.
It's interesting that the authors have coined the new term 'myconeuston' to differentiate between fungi and plankton in the neuston. What are your thoughts on the potential for interactions between the two groups such as competition for light and nutrients?
The paper also mentioned terrestrial fungi deposited by wind. It would be interesting to speculate if they act as an invasive species of sorts or the infection effects the fungi would have on larger marine organisms such as flying fish which spends a large amount of time at the surface or marine mammals coming up to breathe.
Hi Bekki
DeleteTo my knowledge there hasn't been a study looking specifically at competition between fungi and other planktonic organisms, with regard to light and nutrients. Most of the studies of marine fungi have been isolated and cultured in terrestrial environments and have not looked at the interactions between fungi and plankton in vivo. I do believe that there is likely to be an effect on other microorganisms as fungi feed osmotrophically. They obtain their nutrients by breaking down polymers outside of the cells using enzymes and transport the digested nutrients back through the chitin cell wall. Many marine bacteria feed osmotrophically as well, so in low nutrient areas there is likely to be a level of competition in the surface waters.
Marine fungi are certainly known to be parasites of other marine organisms, including corals, as well as using other feeding strategies such as saprotrophy and mutualism within other organisms. Certainly one group of fungi are able to colonize marine invertebrates, fish, amphibians and mammals (Glockling et al, 2013) This group is known to have both terrestrial, marine and freshwater phylotypes and although it is only one group of fungi that has been studied, I think it is feasible that other groups of fungi will also show this capacity for varied associations with other organisms.
There’s still a lot of work to be done uncovering the ecology of marine fungi and I hope this helps answer your questions. I have detailed the paper below that I referenced from.
Anita
Glockling, S.L., Marshall, W.L. and Gleason, F.H. (2013) Phylogenetic interpretations and ecological potentials of the Mesomycetozoea (Ichthyosporea), Fungal Ecology, 6, (4), 237-247.