Pelteobagrus
fulvidraco, or the yellow catfish, is a freshwater organism that dominates
Asian aquaculture industry due to its excellent meat quality. However, it is
often severely affected by bacterial infectious diseases which can cause the
industry severe losses. The stability of an organism’s intestinal flora is
extremely important in the natural resistance of fish to bacterial infections
caused by pathogens in the digestive tract.
Wu et al. (2010), investigated the microbiota in the
intestinal contents and mucus of P.
fulvidraco. We assume (as it is not clearly stated) that the aim of their
study was to identify any differences in the two microbiomes, but also to see
whether 16S rDNA sequencing could improve on previous, more traditional
methods. They reference a few papers who have found that 16S rDNA sequencing
provided them with novel sequences when compared to traditional agar
cultivation (e.g. Holben et al., 2002), however none have looked at this
particular organism.
The results of this study showed that Aeromonads are the most common in the guts – some of which possess
virulence factors required to induce disease. However, the most dominant
bacterial species belonged to Proteobacteria,
which is knowledge consistent with other literature. What is most interesting
about their results is that they identified most of the organisms found in the
intestinal contents and in the mucus as opportunistic pathogens – this has also
been seen in studies relating to human intestinal microbiota (Hand, 2016). By
using 16S rDNA sequencing in this study the authors were able to determine that
the alimentary microflora of fish is more complex than originally thought.
Overall, this study has resulted in a number of novel
discoveries about the composition of the intestinal and mucus microbiota in P. fulvidraco. However, at the beginning
of the paper Wu et al., stated that “knowledge about the fish microbiota would
help to understand the disturbances…brought about during these disease
outbreaks”. The authors do not make a link between what their results show and
any further studies possible, which presumably could be quite advantageous to
the aquaculture industry, in order to investigate or prevent the outbreaks of
disease in farmed communities.
Studied paper
Wu, S., Gao, T., Zheng, Y., Wang, W., Cheng, Y., Wang, G.
(2010). Microbial diversity of intestinal contents and mucus in yellow catfish
(Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). Aquaculture (303) 1-7.
References
Hand, T. (2016). The Role of the Microbiota in Shaping
Infectious Immunity. Trends in Immunology
(37), No. 10.
Holben, W. E., Williams, P., Gilbert, M. A., Saarinen, M.,
Serkilahti, L. K., Apajalahti., J. H. (2002). Phylogenetic analysis of
intestinal microflora indicates a novel Mycoplasma
phylotype in farmed and wild salmon. Microbial
Ecology (44), 175-185.
Hi Megan,
ReplyDeleteThank you for this interesting post regarding studies of microbiota in economically important commercial fish. I would just like you to clear up what is meany buy "identify any differences in the two microbiomes". Are the authors comparing healthy micro biomes to diseased ones or are they comparing the microbiota of the mucus to that of the gut?
Thanks again,
Ellen
Hi Ellen,
DeleteSorry if that phrase was a bit vague! They were investigating both the intestinal microbiome and the mucus biome, then making comparisons between them.
Megan
Hi Megan,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post. You mention that the aim of the paper was to identify any differences in the intestinal and mucus biome, I was just wondering if they found any? Also you say the majority of the taxa found were opportunistic pathogens did the authors specify the effects of this on the health of the host?
Thank you,
Amelia