Monday, 30 October 2017

Should I burrow?

Marine sediments harbor an abundance of microbial communities and the credit for this, as well as facilitating their biogeochemical processes, goes to bioturbating fauna such as crustaceans, polychaetes, and bivalves that dominate infaunal assemblages (Woodin, 1974) and act as ‘ecosystem engineers’ (Taylor and Cunliffe, 2015). They also alter the geochemical properties of sediments and impact microbial populations. But what about the microbial community in the (neighbouring) sediment that is undisturbed?
Papers mentioned in Taylor and Cunliffe (2015) state that bacterial abundance is greater in burrows than in the surrounding unaffected sediment and the diversity between them is distinct. This is because they provide distinct microhabitats and are geochemically different in composition.
Hediste (Nereis) diversicolor, the model organism in this paper, has semi-permanent burrows that impact sediment geochemical properties by aiding oxygenation of water and mixing of the sediment. Therefore, this study compares the microbial (bacteria and eukarya) diversity between bioturbated sediment (which stimulates oil degradation) and un-bioturbated sediment.
DNA and RNA were extracted from the un-bioturbated sediment (without H. diversicolor) and burrow samples. To assess microbial activity and differences in community, RNA samples from both types of sediments were used for 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA Q-RT-PCR and were amplified. 16S rRNA genes from DNA samples from the two sediments were also amplified by PCR. An Ion Torrent was used for sequencing and the data was analysed using the an open-source bioinformatics software package. Using RISA, they assessed the effect of H. diversicolor on bacterial communities in oil-contaminated sediment. Using a combination of T-RFLP and clone libraries, they assessed the changes in structure of bacterial communities in polluted sediments.
The total eukaryotic and bacterial communities were more active in burrows (18S and 16S rRNA transcripts were significantly higher, respectively). When 18S (for eukarya) and 16S (for bacteria) rRNA transcript OTUs were analysed, the burrow population formed distinct clusters. In H. diversicolor burrows, the orders Alteromonadales, Methylococcales, Oceanospirillales and Thiotrichales were more abundant. According to 18S rRNA sequences, fungi (Basidiomycota) dominated both types of sediment. Through interactions with oil-degrading bacteria, fungi are known to directly degrade hydrocarbons. 
This paper also focused on relative abundance of obligate hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria (OHCB). From 16S rRNA sequences with DNA and RNA gene library analysis, Cycloclasticus were found in high abundance in burrows and were also present in unbioturbated sediment. Alcanivorax, Marinobacter and Oleibacter were also prevalent in the burrows and were either absent or present in low amounts in the unbioturbated sediment. Alcanivorax, Marinobacter and Cycloclasticus have been shown to possess oil degrading properties (Taylor and Cunliffe, 2015).
OHCB has shown to respond to changes, such as oil influx (Taylor and Cunliffe, 2015). Assessment of the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico using 18S rRNA gene pyrosequencing showed that fungi dominate post-spill communities too. In H. diversicolor burrows, Cycloclasticus, Alcanivorax and Deltaproteobacteria (major components after the Prestige oil spill) were less abundant and this is due to oxygenation of the burrows causing a switch in metabolism, resulting in more rapid hydrocarbon degradation (Taylor and Cunliffe, 2015). The potential for bacterial communities to remediate polluted sediments is reduced in the presence of bacterivorous meiofauna, which decrease mineralization rates and alter bacterial community structure (Näslund et al., 2010).
This paper provides a good understanding of the relationship between burrowing organisms and microbial abundance and diversity. It also highlights the importance of these microbial communities in natural remediation through the process of degradation of polluted (oil contaminated) sediments. This in turn, gives us an insight into the anthropogenic impacts on the sediment and how organisms that inhabit these sediment cope as a result. To gain a deeper perspective of this, the feature of the burrow (such as lining) and the host invertebrate’s characteristics is important to establish. Although this paper has touched upon some biological limiting factors and Woodin (1974) has demonstrated the importance of biological interactions to the determination of species abundance in sediment, it would be interesting to see the effect of physical limiting factors. Another concept to bear in mind would be the stability-time hypothesis to further explain patterns of diversity of the hosts as well as the microbes. 

Bibliography

Paper Reviewed -

Taylor and Cunliffe. (2015). Polychaete burrows harbour distinct microbial communities in oil-contaminated coastal sediments. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 7(4), 606–613.

Additional references - 

Woodin, S. A. (1974). Polychaete Abundance Patterns in a Marine Soft-Sediment Environment: The Importance of Biological Interactions. Ecological Monographs, 44(2), 171-187.

Johan Näslund, F. J. (2010, May 13). Meiofauna reduces bacterial mineralization of naphthalene in marine sediment. Retrieved from www.nature.com: http://www.nature.com/ismej/journal/v4/n11/full/ismej201063a.html


Charles C. Steward, S. C. (1996, March 28). Microbial biomass and community structures in the burrows of bromophenol producing and non-producing marine worms and surrounding sediments. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 133, 149-165.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Ankitha,

    Really interesting read. I love how the paper incorporates a view of the diversity of microbiota in both disturbed and undisturbed habitat that can be found side by side. One thing I will say is that the first paragraph doesn't mention that the authors are also incorporating polluted sediments in their study. This left me slightly confused as I began to read what I assume to be the summary of the results for this paper and discovered that you were not only discussing bio-turbated and un-bioturbated habitat but also the effects of pollution.
    I feel that you could benefit from breaking up the text with paragraphs to avoid confusion in the future. Other than this, a very enjoyable read and I look forward to your next post!

    Thanks again,
    Ellen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ellen,

      Yes, I see where the confusion lies. Apologies for not making that part clear.
      I think I was trying to cut down the words.

      Cheers,
      Ankitha

      Delete
  2. Hi Ankitha,

    A very interesting post; the fact that some bacteria are able to degrade oil is fascinating. I was just wondering if the paper mentioned how these obligate hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria (OHCB) are able to degrade oil? Also, would you be able to explain what Q-RT-PCR is?

    Thank you
    Georgia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Georgia,

      Thank you for your thoughts.

      qPCR (as we know) is used to measure DNA amplification using fluorescent dyes.
      RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) is used to detect gene expression through synthesis of of cDNA using RNA. The enzyme reverse transcriptase is used to reverse transcribe RNA into its complementary DNA strand.

      Q-RT-PCR (Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) is a combination of the two techniques and is used to quantify RNA levels. This method allows us to directly measure each cycle of PCR products and can amplify and detect genes of interest in a single step (Overbergh et al, 2003). The method is fast, sensitive, accurate and require a low sample size.
      This method was made possible by the synthesis of a probe that can hybridize with the sequence of interest (NCBI).

      To answer your first question, no the authors didn't go through in great detail as to how bacteria were able to degrade oil. Das and Chandran (2011) states that bacteria act as primary degraders of spilled oil in environment and are the most active agents in petroleum degradation. They are thought to exclusively feed on hydrocarbons and utilise hydrocarbons as their sole source of carbon.
      They however, need to have necessary metabolic capabilities, nutrients oxygen etc, to be able to biodegrade. The nature of the oil and its surface area and also their concentrations, are important factors to bear in mind. Das and Chandran (2011) provides several examples of the different types of bacteria, yeast, fungi and alga are able to degrade different types of oil contaminants.

      Hope this was helpful.

      Thanks,
      Ankitha

      Reference:

      Real-Time qRT-PCR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techqpcr/

      Overbergh, L., Giulietti, A., Valckx, D., Decallonne, B., Bouillon, R., & Mathieu, C. (2003). The Use of Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR for the Quantification of Cytokine Gene Expression. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT, 14(1), 33–43 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2279895/

      Nilanjana Das and Preethy Chandran, “Microbial Degradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminants: An Overview,” Biotechnology Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 941810, 13 pages, 2011 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/btri/2011/941810/cta/

      Delete
  3. Hi Ankitha,

    I really enjoyed your post and I find the potential applications of microbes degrading oil particularly interesting. You mention that the fungi, Basidiomycota, was dominant in both types of sediment, just to clarify did the authors say whether the abundance was affected by bioturbation or pollution? I was wondering if the paper specified in more detail the role of bacterial fungal interactions in degrading oil?

    Many thanks,
    Amelia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Amelia,

      Thanks for your thoughts.

      To answer your first question - No, they only mention that Basidiomycota's 18S rRNA sequences dominated both bioturbated and un-bioturbated sediment.

      To answer your second question - No, the paper does not mention how oil is degraded by bacteria. But from the lectures, I understand that microbes such as Alcanivorax and Cycloclasticus can form biofilms around the cocktail of hydrocarbons (oil droplets) such as alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons and can either anaerobically or aerobically (R strategists) degrade oil using different pathways and enzymes and use this as a source of carbon. In the absence of oil they use an alternate source of carbon supply that leak from the seabed, use a natural source from phytoplankton or go into a dormant state.
      The fungi have a role in degrading aromatic hydrocarbons by making surfactants, making oil droplets more soluble; which is an additional role of marine bacteria, that leak out biosurfactants from their membrane for the same purpose.
      So, there is a double relationship observed between fungi and bacteria to degrade oil.

      Hope this helps,

      Ankitha

      Delete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.