It’s becoming increasingly prevalent the importance and
diversity of the marine environment and in more recent times the marine
microbial world. This is due to the genetic and metabolic diversity of marine
microbes and their capability of producing numerous chemical compounds, many of
which could have a use within our society. This study explores using marine microbes
for human medicine in the field of antibiotic production and wound healing. The
authors specifically investigating the mutualistic interaction between the Elasmobranchs
and the bacteria found in their epidermal mucus.
In the Study 4 Elasmobranch species mucus's were investigated
as a source of antibiotic activity against several known infectious human pathogens.
This concept has been previously investigated in other species such as Elkhorn
coral (Acropora palmate), Ritchie(2006) found that over 20% of bacteria isolated from the mucus demonstrated
antibiotic activity. Another study testing fish mucus was Bergsson et al (2005) in which they found numerous bacteria in the mucus of the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhu) which had potential for antibiotic activity. The Elasmobranchs are a great test species
due to their known ability to heal quickly and efficiently as well as generally low wound infection rates indicating possible bacterial mutualism.
The test species used were the Cownose ray (Rhinoptera bonasus), Devil ray(Mobula hypostoma), Marine Atlantic ray as
well as the freshwater Atlantic ray (Dasyatis
Sabina) and the Clearnose skate (Raja
eglanteria). All of which can be found off the Gulf of Mexico. Of these
sample species the collection and sampling methods varied , with 3 of
the organisms being sampled and released at time of capture and the other 2
species being bought back to the lab for sampling. Regardless of collection
method all samples were obtained by the passive scraping of the mucus on the
pectoral fin surface. Once collected the samples were transferred to sterile culture
tubes before being centrifuged to separate the mucus. Theses samples were then serially diluted and
then cultures were grown, isolating the mucus associated bacteria for further tests.
The isolated colonies were then analysed for antibacterial
properties against pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains. After this initial
testing the bacteria exhibiting antibiotic production were further characterized
by testing for blood lysis potential and production of antimicrobial peptides.
The DNA from the pure samples of all antibiotic producing isolates were extracted using a power soil DNA extracting kit. The 16S rRNA genes were
then amplified using PCR with the results of being sent for analysis at ULUC
core sequencing facilities. Sequences were analysed using the GenBank Basic Local Alignment Tool- BLAST to determine % similarity of the sampled bacteria to the international
bacteria database.
In this study every elasmobranch tested had mucus associated
bacteria that displayed antibiotic activity against common pathogens.
Collectively over 16% of the bacterial isolates showed antibiotic activity
against certain common pathogens ,with 3% of these showing broad spectrum antibiotic
activity or specific activity against VRE or MRSA.These bacteria were from 5
different genera.
This study could help with targeting bacterial growth conditions
for further antibiotic screening and advances in medical studies .Although in early stages it highlights the need and opportunity for future work in this field
which could lead to huge advances in antibiotic development. The study was
funded by the department of defence for possible advances in wound healing
and control of infection in a military capacity, I think this shows the scope
that marine research is beginning to have in all fields and how important it
could be to human medicine in years to come.
Reviewed Paper
Ritchie, K., Schwarz, M., Mueller, J., Lapacek, V.,
Merselis, D., Walsh, C. and Luer, C. (2017). Survey of Antibiotic-producing
Bacteria Associated with the Epidermal Mucus Layers of Rays and Skates.
Frontiers in Microbiology, 8.
Bergsson, G.,
Agerberth, B., Jörnvall, H. and Gudmundsson, G. H. (2005), Isolation and
identification of antimicrobial components from the epidermal mucus of Atlantic
cod (Gadus morhua).
FEBS Journal, 272: 4960–4969. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04906x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04906.x/full
Ritchie, K. (2006). Regulation of microbial populations
by coral surface mucus and mucus-associated bacteria. Marine Ecology
Progress Series, 322, 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24870854
Hi Pippa,
ReplyDeleteI thought this was a really interesting read - it'd be brilliant if these bacteria could contribute to antibiotic development!
In your first paragraph you have stated that Elasmobranch's are a good test subject due to their known ability to heal quickly and efficiently as well as generally low wound infection rates - do you have a reference for this? I'd love to be able to read more about it.
Also, the two different sampling methods for different species has me a bit confused. Do the authors state why some species were sampled on the boat whilst others were taken back to the lab? Surely this could introduce some bias into the results?
Thanks,
Megan
Hi Megan,
DeleteThanks for reading, it really is quite an interested concept isn't it!
In answer to your question they give quite a lot of references to support the elasmobranchs ability to heal,but I have selected a few of the more recent studies for you.
- Hoyos-padilla et al (2013)- Observation of any attack by cookie cutter sharks on white sharks .Pacific science.67
- Towner et al (2012)-'Boat-strike wound healing in Carharoden carcharias.In Global perspectives on the Biology and life history of white sharks (book)
- Chin et al (2015) - Black tip reef sharks show high capacity for wound healing and recovery following injury- Conservation physiology.
In regards to the variation in sample methods,the capture methods do vary between species with the Cownose and Devil ray being collected passively in shallow waters. Then using a seine net they would surrounded the shoal and then individually transfer them on to the boat into a live well. The Marine Atlantic rays were caught near shore using cast nets.Finally the deeper water species Clearnose skate and Freshwater Atlantic ray were caught using baited lines.
They state that all animals were collected following the guidelines specified by the Florida fish and wildlife conservation commission and I imagine this I why they collected some samples in the lab and some on board, but it didn't specify any more than that in the paper. However I don't know if a bias was caused if this would be a problem as the studies purpose was not to find which species was the most efficient but just to see if the antibiotic producing bacteria were present. They also did not have the same sample size of each species which I would imagine would have also caused a bias if they were looking at which species was more efficient.
Hope this answers your questions.
Thanks again for reading,
Pippa