The growing
abundance of microplastics is a major cause of concern due to the most likely
harmful effects on ecosystems and human health. Plastic debris can disperse
over long distances as wind, waves and currents all contribute to the transport
the particles. Moreover, synthetic polymers are more durable than biopolymers,
which leads to their accumulation in the environment. Furthermore, microplastics
can also serve as surfaces for microbial biofilms that form so called ‘plastispheres’
which are distinct from the surrounding water. These plastispheres could in
turn lead to the transport of microbes over longer distances.
Previous
studies (Zettler et al. 2013) (De Tender et al. 2015) have identified potential
pathogenic Vibrio spec. sequences in plastispheres.
However, the scientists were not able to identify the exact Vibrio species present. In their study
Kirstein et al. (2016) set out to detect potentially pathogenic Vibrio species on microplastic biofilms
in the North and Baltic Seas.
Samples of
both microplastics and seawater were collected from various sites in the North Sea
(39 sites) and the Baltic Sea (5 sites). Subsequently, the samples were
analyzed with selective enrichment for pathogenic Vibrio species and Mass Spectrometry for species identification. The
presence of regulatory and virulence-associated genes was examined using
PCR-amplification. The collected synthetic polymers were identified using
Optical Spectrometry.
Out of the
sampled microplastics, most were withering and at least partially covered with
biofilms. Polyethylene was the most abundant synthetic polymer in all sample
sites (> 40%, however, it is also one of the most widely produced synthetic
polymers. The analysis of the associated biofilms showed 13 % of the
microplastic samples to house cultivable Vibrios,
among them the potential pathogen V.
parahaemolyticus. Although the microbial communities in plastispheres weredistinct
from their surroundings, in most cases the Vibrio species occurred both in the surrounding
water and the plastispheres. Analysis of the water isolates showed V. parahaemolyticus to be the most
abundant species. However, the scientists were only able to detect a virulence
associated gene in one V.
parahaemolyticus strain out of the 104 strains cultivated in total.
The findings
on the distribution of the potentially pathogenic Vibrios reflected the results of previous studies. V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus were dominant in the North Sea sites, with the
latter also reported once in microplastics in the Baltic Sea. In contrast, V. vulnificus and V. cholerae were more abundant in the Baltic Sea. In this study,
only V. parahaemolyticus and V. fluvialis were detected on both
microplastic and seawater samples. Moreover, most Vibrios occurred in coastal and estuarine environments.
Polymer
type, along with season and geographical location, seems to influence the
plastisphere communities. However, free-living and attached Vibrios appear to be equally influenced by
environmental conditions.
In
conclusion, this study confirms the presence of potentially pathogenic Vibrios on microplastic particles.
Surrounding seawater is suggested to be the likely source for the colonization
of microplastics by microbes. However, conclusive evidence for hitchhiking, pathogenic
Vibrios is beyond the scope of this paper. The authors acknowledge that the distribution
of microplastics would have to be researched in a more systematic way in order
to provide such evidence.
Nevertheless, with Vibrio abundance on the rise due to climate change (Vezulli et al. 2016) and the accumulation of microplastics on shores, the potential danger of the long-distance transport of pathogens is very worth examining.
Nevertheless, with Vibrio abundance on the rise due to climate change (Vezulli et al. 2016) and the accumulation of microplastics on shores, the potential danger of the long-distance transport of pathogens is very worth examining.
Reference:
Kirstein, I. V., Kirmizi, S., Wichels, A., Garin-Fernandez,
A., Erler, R., Löder, M., & Gerdts, G. (2016). Dangerous hitchhikers? Evidence for potentially
pathogenic Vibrio spp. on microplastic particles. Marine Environmental
Research, 120, 1-8. Link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014111361630112X
Further Reading:
De Tender,
C. A., Devriese, L. I., Haegeman, A., Maes, S., Ruttink, T., & Dawyndt, P.
(2015). Bacterial community profiling of plastic litter in the Belgian part of
the North Sea. Environmental science & technology, 49(16), 9629-9638. Link:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b01093
Vezzulli,
L., Grande, C., Reid, P., Helauet, P., Ewards, M., holfe, M., … Pruzzo, C.
(2016). Climate influence on Vibrio and associated human diseases during the
past half-century in the coastal North Atlantic. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 113(34), E5062–E5071. doi:10.1073/pnas.1609157113
Link: http://www.pnas.org/content/113/34/E5062.abstract
Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., & Amaral-Zettler, L. A.
(2013). Life in the
“plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environmental
science & technology, 47(13), 7137-7146. Link: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es401288x
Hi Johanna,
ReplyDeleteThis is a really interesting paper; Vibrios on plastispheres is not something I have ever thought about. How do you think future studies could go about researching this idea of hitchhicking? Is there further research into the type of polymer and how this affects the Vibrio species associated with the plastisphere?
Thank you,
Chloe
Hi Chloe,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your questions. I guess scientists could try to model the long-distance transport of microplastics. I was able to find a paper that models microplastic transport worldwide (Sherman & van Sebille 2016), but there doesn’t seem to be one specifically for the North and Baltic Seas yet. If the focus was on human pathogens, data on V. cholerae infections could potentially be correlated with predicted microplastic accumulation in those areas. Alternatively, samples of Vibrio spec that were only detected attached to microplastics, could be traced back to possible sources. This wouldn’t necessarily be conclusive evidence for hitchhiking but I have honestly got no bright ideas how to set out to do it. Maybe someone else wants to contribute?
Regarding your second question, the substrate-specificity of Vibrios on synthetic polymers has not been examined yet. Moreover, geographic location seems to influence plastisphere communities more than polymer type (Amaral-Zettler et al. 2015).
Zettler et al. (2013) were able to find evidence for active hydrolysis of polyethylene hydrocarbon polymers from microbes other than Vibrios. However, V. parahemolyticus and V. alginolyticus at least seem to be able to degrade polyvinyl alcohol-low linear density polyethylene (PVA-LLDPE) (Raghul et al. 2014).
Hope this is helpful,
Johanna
References:
Amaral-Zettler, L. A., Zettler, E. R., Slikas, B., Boyd, G. D., Melvin, D. W., Morrall, C. E., ... & Mincer, T. J. (2015). The biogeography of the Plastisphere: implications for policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(10), 541-546. Link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/150017/abstract
Raghul, S. S., Bhat, S. G., Chandrasekaran, M., Francis, V., & Thachil, E. T. (2014). Biodegradation of polyvinyl alcohol-low linear density polyethylene-blended plastic film by consortium of marine benthic vibrios. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(7), 1827-1834. Link: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-013-0335-8
Sherman, P., & van Sebille, E. (2016). Modeling marine surface microplastic transport to assess optimal removal locations. Environmental Research Letters, 11(1), 014006. Link: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014006/meta;jsessionid=927F323018822FA520CD6198966601AF.c3.iopscience.cld.iop.org
Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013). Life in the “plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environmental science & technology, 47(13), 7137-7146. Link: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es401288x
Hi Johanna,
ReplyDeletethanks for your review! It is frightening me that microplastic seems to have even more negative impacts on the environment than we previously knew. After this paper it is known that microplastic e.g. not only poison animals and finally us humans but also may lead to an increase of Vibrio diseases. So I think that it is more than urgent to think of sustainable and less harmful alternatives to using plastics.
Thus, I feel it is very important to do more research on how Vibrios and also other pathogenic bacteria spread with human-introduced particles etc. and to understand the mechanisms and factors influencing the proliferation.
Eleni
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi again,
ReplyDeletethere is a master thesis on 'Attachment of potentially human pathogenic Vibrio spp. to synthetic polymers (plastics) in the marine environment' at the Alfred-Wegener-Institut (AWI) in Bremerhaven/GER.
They also looking for students for a master thesis about the 'Growth of pathogenic Vibrio spp. due to an increase of water temperature' (I think it will be a bit like the work Vezzulli et al. have been doing).
Have a look if you are interested (not all the description are available in English): https://www.awi.de/en/work-study/jobs/job-offer.html
Eleni