The
surface mucopolysaccharide layer (SML) of coral harbours a diverse community of
microbiota that is crucial to the health of the coral. This community provides
a wide range of functions such as biochemical cycling and antibacterial
production. Corals, however, experience SML microbiota shifts as they are moved
to laboratory aquaria and this may be a confounding variable in many studies of
coral-associated bacterial communities. Such shifts result in less diverse SML
microbial communities compared to in situ
coral SML samples. Pratte et al.
(2014) set to investigate the temporal dynamics of these shifts.
Coral fragments from five scleractinian coral were collected from the
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Coral Nursery. Automated
ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) was used to investigate the
dynamics of the SML microbiota shift of the coral Siderastrea siderea after
transfer from a natural environment to aquaria.
Samples from the initial SML bacterial communities and those collected
one day after transfer were the most diverse compared to samples from days 7,14
and 28. Initial SML bacterial community samples and those one day after
transfer clustered independently from each other and all other samples. This
indicates a substantial shift in the SML community after transfer. One week
after transfer the SML bacteria showed tighter clustering indicating more
similar communities. The SML bacterial communities began to stabilise 7-14 days
after transfer. Despite this stabilisation, the initial and final communities
were very different. There are many possible reasons for this shift such as a
change in available nutrients or disruption of microbial interactions. Another
possible explanation is that this shift reflects the coral’s inability to maintain
the pre-existing SML community due to stress. This could be further detrimental
to the coral if beneficial bacteria are lost. The authors attempted to identify
the bacterial community members via clone libraries but GenBank did not contain
matches for the majority of the clones sequence suggesting that coral
bacterial studies should target the 16S rRNA gene.
This is the first study to examine the
temporal dynamics of the shift in coral SML microbiota when host corals are
transferred from the reef to aquaria. The results from this study that there
might be limited learning potential from
lab based experiments if bacterial communities are very dissimilar to natural
populations. The use of more in situ studies may be beneficial but would also
incur extra costs. If lab experiments are used then they should be left to
stabilise for at least 14 days in order to limit any false results from
shifting communities. Further understanding of bacterial communities which make
up the SML in both natural and lab conditions will help us to understand how
these changes affect the coral. This could possibly be used to help limit
differences between the two populations and their impact on the coral. This may
allow lab experiments to be used with more confidence with results having more
ecological significance.
Pratte, Z.
A., Richardson, L. L., & Mills, D. K. (2015). Microbiota shifts in the
surface mucopolysaccharide layer of corals transferred from natural to aquaria
settings. Journal of invertebrate pathology, 125, 42-44
Hi Maria,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed this post. I was wondering whether there was any mention that the change in the microbiota could be a beneficial change to the coral? I was wondering if it could lead to a community that is more adaptable to the changing climate and stress in the coral systems.
Hi Maria
ReplyDeleteI was wandering what sort of aquaria they used in this study? Did it have water pumped from the reef environment or was it circulated artificial water, like one would have in a home reef aquarium?
Hi Sam, the authors have suggested that these shifts in bacterial community may reflect the coral’s inability to maintain the pre-existing SML community due to stress and possibly compromise the coral’s overall health is beneficial bacteria are lost. However, more studies need to be carried out to see how these changes in community structure affect the coral.
ReplyDeleteHi Kat, 21-litre aquaria were set up using unfiltered artificial sea water (ASW) and 25% water exchange with ASW was conducted 15 days into the experiment (which is standard coral husbandry)