Iron is a fundamental element involved in many biochemical
processes including oxidative phosphorylation, photosynthesis, nitrogen
fixation, and the detoxification of free radicals. However, dissolved inorganic
Fe is scarce in the marine environment due to its propensity to precipitate in
the presence of oxygen and relatively high oceanic pH levels. Fe is rapidly
scavenged onto particles under such conditions leading to mean global concentrations
of just 0.07 nmol kg-1. Of this dissolved iron 99.9% exists bound to
disparate organic ligands which are present in high numbers. So does this mean
that organically bound iron is unavailable to marine heterotrophic bacteria for
growth?
Siderophores are small molecules with a high affinity for
chelating and forming complexes with Fe3+ and are produced in
response to iron depravation by microorganisms. Siderophores are released
extracellularly where they bind inorganic iron and ‘steal’ iron from other
organic complexes with lower affinities. Siderophores are then internalised and
the iron assimilated to help fulfil cellular iron requirements for growth. This
study investigated how heterotrophic marine bacteria acquired iron for growth
and the extent to which siderophores played a role in iron acquisition.
Seven gram-negative heterotrophic marine bacteria strains isolated
from the Gulf of Mexico, Sargasso Sea, and NE subarctic Pacific were grown
under iron-replete (8.4 µM) and iron-deplete (12.5 nM) conditions. Cellular
iron uptake rates and iron quotas were quantified using the radioactive
isotope 55Fe. The growth
rates of all 7 strains were reduced on average by 50% on the iron-deplete
growth medium and iron quotas were significantly reduced.
Separate culture medium was used for the isolation of
siderophores and their iron binding strength determined. Iron chelating
compounds were produced by 4 of the 7 strains with one siderophore isolated
from the Gulf of Mexico having an extremely high affinity for Fe, binding
>99% of available iron. Importantly siderophore production only occurred
under iron limiting conditions. However all strains utilised Fe bound to at
least one siderophore whether or not that strain produced its own.
The importance of
siderophores in the rate of iron uptake was quantified by comparing Fe uptake
of all 7 strains on iron-deplete medium with and without the addition of
siderophores isolated from 2 of the 7 strains, and a terrestrial fungal
siderophore. The results showed that one marine siderophore and the fungal
siderophore increased Fe uptake in the majority of strains, while the other
isolated marine siderophore inhibited Fe uptake in 5 of the 7 strains whilst
significantly increasing Fe uptake in the producing strain.
Two representative strains were used to elucidate the significance
of organic vs inorganic iron uptake. The measured Fe uptake rates of inorganic
Fe were tiny compared to the expected uptake rates based on diffusive flux. An ecological implication being that marine heterotrophic bacteria are not
optimised to acquire inorganic iron for growth. Instead they rely on
organically bound iron, unlike many eukaryotic phytoplankton species which
require inorganic iron for growth.
The utilisation of siderophores of differing provenance
(terrestrial as well as marine) suggest that perhaps only a finite amount of
iron chelating compounds exist and that bacteria have evolved to be able to
utilise iron bound to siderophores that it does not/cannot synthesise.
Conversely a bacterium may monopolise iron in certain situations by specialising
in the production of an uncommon ligand with high iron affinity that binds much
of the available iron, thus inhibiting the growth of neighbouring bacterial
heterotrophs.
I found the paper a valuable contribution to the in vitro study of siderophores and iron
acquisition by bacteria. Further characterisation of marine siderophores and cellular
uptake mechanisms need to be investigated to better understand the significance
of siderophores in ocean biogeochemical cycles. For example; in this study
differing bacteria were isolated from distinctly different water masses and it
would be purposeful to see if differences in siderophores and siderophore specificity
reflects their ecology and iron acquisition strategy.
Reference
Granger, Julie, and Neil M. Price. "The importance of siderophores in iron nutrition of heterotrophic marine bacteria." Limnology and Oceanography 44.3 (1999): 541-555.
http://m.avto.aslo.info/lo/toc/vol_44/issue_3/0541.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments from external users are moderated before posting.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.