Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP)
is an organic sulphur compound which is produced by many types of phytoplankton.
It plays various roles for phytoplankton and in the marine microbial world
e.g.: anti predation, osmolytes and cryoprotectants. Until recently, it was thought that
phytoplankton were the only producers of this molecule, however recently it was
discovered that the gastrodermis of corals symbiotic zooxanthallae contains
DMSP lyase, and their symbiotic dinoflagellates contain high levels of DMSP. Researches
in the past have found that stressed conditions causes an increase of reduced
oxygen species accompanied by increased DMSP. If DMSP production in corals changes in stressed
conditions, it could become a bioindicator, which would be very useful with the
increase of temperatures and severe weather patterns.
The study was carried out at
several different stations in the Great Barrier Reef, one at the Heron Island
Research Station’s aquarium complex though out a succession of winters
(September) and summers (February) from 2001 to 2003. Another base was at Nelly Bay, on the eastern
coast of Magnetic island. This fringing reef has many environmental impacts:
increased nutrients, suspended sediments due to dredging, nutrient run-off,
sewage discharge and increased bleaching events. The studies on this fringing reef
were conducted 5 months after the severe bleaching event in the summer of 1994.
This site was used to compare to other reefs as “stressed”.
This study measured two different
factors with Acropora
intermedia, : DMSP production between 2001-2003, and the effects
of raising the seawater temperature by +2 °C measured by production DMSP and levels
of cellular DMSP and Chlorophyll a(Chl.
a). They then compared this to the Magnetic Island reef (consisting of Pocillopera damicornis ) off the coast
of Magnetic Island in the central Great Barrier Reef, to study the differences between stressed an
non stressed corals.
Acropora intermedia collected from Heron Island showed distinct seasonal cycling of DMSP
with increased production during the summer, and lower in the winter. This was distinct
each year despite the severe bleaching event of 2002. The year with the largest production of DMSP
was the summer months with the high sea surface temperature (SST), solar
radiation and rainfall. By
increasing the water temperatures by +2 °C in the summer and winter, A. intermedia’s DMSP production increased
by 45%, compared to the winter 2001 and summer 2002. The cellular DMSP increased in the winter of
2002 and summer 2003, almost half a year after coral bleaching. The authors
suggested that the increase was due to higher temperatures and high rainfall.
Cellular chlorophyll a concentrations decreased from 2001-2001 (bleaching) but
then increased the next summer as the coral recovered.
When comparing the Heron Bay site to
the Magnetic Island site, they found that there was a highly significant
correlation between cellular DMSP and chlorophyll a. This could show an adaptive
response to increased numbers of reduced oxygen species which had been produced
during the bleaching event, and also may have helped the corals recovery. The Increased
cellular DMSP could also have been caused by changes in the symbiont community.
Measurements have been made on Acropora coral from many different locations
from across the Great Barrier Reef which leads to the suggestion that changes
in the cellular/tissue concentration is a sensitive indicator to stress
This study suggests that DMSP is a
bioindicator for all types of stress and does put forward some evidence for
this theory, however there was little evidence that any of the stress that
caused the DMSP to be released was manmade, it may have been mainly temperature.
If this is the case, although it is interesting, how could we use this
indicator? If it was affected by the sediments/ nutrient run-off, then we could
use the indicator to reduce the anthropogenic pollutants in the area but we
cannot change temperature. On the other hand it may be interesting to see if
this effects when pathogens attack the corals, as they can use chemotaxis to
follow DMSP to stressed corals which are easier to attack.
Jones, Graham B., et al.
"The effect of coral bleaching on the cellular concentration of
dimethylsulphoniopropionate in reef corals." Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 460 (2014): 19-31.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002209811400166X
Hi Sam,
ReplyDeleteThis area of microbiology is extremely interesting. With coral reef stress being identified through the presence of elevated DMSP levels, I am wondering if it could also be a chemical signal to different zooxanthellae species encouraging them to inhabit the stressed/bleached corals. I will see if I can fins any relevant papers to investigate this thought, have you found anything along with this?
Thanks
Emma
Hi Emma,
DeleteLinking DMSP to attracting zooxanthallae attraction is an interesting point and whilst I didn’t find any papers linking DMSP attraction being used to replace the zooxanthallae expelled during bleaching (which I think is what you were thinking about when you asked the question), I did find a paper investigating the link between DMSP and Pelagic fish abundance on corals. They touch very briefly on the fact that coral spawning may be affected by the DMSP. However, this is not the main interest of their study and I, personally, thought there may be plenty of other reasons for the fluctuations. I've put the links below so you can have a look at it.
Sorry I couldn’t be more useful and I hope this answers your question,
Sam
DeBose, J. L., and G. A. Nevitt. "Dimethylsulfoniopropionate is linked to coral spawning, fish abundance and squid aggregations over a coral reef."
http://www.nova.edu/ncri/11icrs/proceedings/files/m09-01.pdf
Hi Sam,
ReplyDeleteHow did they measure the DMSP released?
In this study they used two different coral species, from two locations with different levels of stress, it may be useful to see how their DMSP production changes when they switch environments and how quickly they can adapt to these conditions? I feel this could be a good follow on experiment.
Thanks :)
Hi equinton,
DeleteThey measured the DMSP in two different ways. One way was to measure the DMSP concentration in the water, and another was to measure the DMSP production by analysing the coral’s tissue and working out cellular concentration of the DMSP.
I think it’s a good idea to switch conditions, and this would provide a broader knowledge on how corals change with DMSP concentration. You mentioned assessing how quickly they adapted and I was wondering how you would measure this?
Thanks, I hope I answered your question,
Sam
Thankyou for clearing the methods up, its such a long process in quantifying the DMSP and DMS as I just reviewed a paper on it also! You would have to measure it over a period of time, but thinking about it this would be hard as corals are such slow growing organisms so dont have a fast life cycle found in model organisms such as bacteria! It would have to be such a long - term experiment hey! Thanks :)
ReplyDeleteHi Sam,
ReplyDeleteAlthough I have found no evidence that zooxanthellae are attracted to DMSP, a study by Garren et al shows how coral pathogen Vibrio corallilitycus uses chemotaxis to locate stressed corals through their increased production of DMSP when stressed.Thought you might be interested in having a read.
http://www.nature.com/ismej/journal/v8/n5/abs/ismej2013210a.html