As the rate of global plastic production continues to
increase, so too does public awareness of plastic pollution within the marine
environment. Whilst the hazards surrounding larger plastic debris have received
considerable attention from researchers, relatively little is known about the
threats posed by much tinier ‘microplastics’ and how they might interact with
marine microbial communities.
Microplastics
are generally classified as plastic fragments less than 5mm in diameter and
occur when larger plastics break down due to weathering. As with larger plastic
debris, microplastics in the marine environment become swiftly colonised by a
mosaic of bacteria and other microscopic organisms, conglomerating to form
complex biofilms. Previous studies have highlighted how marine plastic
debris-associated microbial populations usually differ in composition from the
surrounding bacterioplankton. As such, the term ‘Plastisphere’ has arisen,
recognising plastic surfaces as novel habitats for their microbial constituents.
Being
lightweight and small in size, microplastics are suspended and transported
readily by waves and currents, allowing their microbial colonisers to hitch
rides over considerable distances. Accordingly, it is plausible that
microplastics may serve as novel vectors for the transportation and dispersal
of microbes.
One
recent study performed by Kirstein et al. investigated the occurrence of
potentially human pathogenic Vibrio bacteria colonising
microplastics within the North and Baltic Seas. The primary focus of the study
was to detect the presence of V. cholerae, V.
parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus; known to cause disease
in humans.
Microplastic
particles were collected from surface waters using a fine mesh net and the
surrounding surface seawater was also sampled so that the occurrence of Vibrio
spp. could be compared between microplastic-attached and bacterioplankton
populations. Microplastic and filtered seawater samples were
incubated individually at 37°C to allow for
the selective enrichment of mesophilic Vibrio spp. Subsequently,
samples displaying growth were plated onto a vibrio-selective agar media and
incubated further. Resulting colonies resembling V. cholerae, V.
parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus were analysed via
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and PCR amplification of species-specific
genes in order to confirm their identification.
Of
the collected microplastics analysed within this study, 13% were found to
exhibit colonisation by cultivatable Vibrio spp. Whilst V.
cholerae and V. vulnificus were detected only within
seawater samples, potentially pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus was
isolated from a number of microplastic particles. Where V. parahaemolyticus was
detected, it was generally present both attached to microplastics and within
the surrounding seawater, suggesting that colonisation of microplastics
by Vibrio spp. may occur from the surrounding bacterioplankton.
Furthermore, sampling efforts within the Baltic Sea were unable to detect V. parahaemolyticus within
surface waters yet identified it associated to a single microplastic particle.
Such an observation may serve as an illustration of Vibrio spp. utilising
microplastic to 'hitch' a ride, persisting into an environment where it may
have otherwise been absent.
Ultimately,
Kirstein et al. have made an important contribution to the understanding of the
hazards surrounding microplastic pollution by providing the first definitive
proof of potentially human pathogenic Vibrio spp. within
marine microplastic biofilms. As average sea surface temperatures continue to
rise, the occurrence of Vibrio infection is increasing in
frequency and geographical range. Moreover, as larger plastic items repeatedly
fragment within the natural environment, marine microplastic concentrations are
set to increase. Accordingly, global warming coupled with the emerging problem
of marine microplastic could prove to be a perilous combination. In order to
fully comprehend the hazards posed by microplastic-attached Vibrio spp.,
subsequent research could perhaps employ a metagenomic approach in order to
gain a clearer understanding of Vibrio abundance, avoiding
possible cultivation
bias.
Reviewed
Paper:
Kirstein,
I. V., Kirmizi, S., Wichels, A., Garin-Fernandez, A., Erler, R., Löder, M.
& Gerdts, G. (2016). Dangerous hitchhikers? Evidence for potentially
pathogenic Vibrio spp. on microplastic particles. Marine
Environmental Research, 120: 1-8.
I really like your summary! Even as a non-native speaker I could perfectly follow your review and get an idea of the study you presented. The topic you chose also catched me, especially since I will write my thesis on microplastic next semester.
ReplyDeleteApparently the formation of complex biofilms on tiny plastic particles increases the weight as significantly as it makes them to sink and "settle" in marine sediment. It is not a recent finding but the actual environmental impact of this process has not been studied sufficiently.
If you are interested in that matter I highly recommending reading the introduction of the following paper (with more references to this subject): Imhof, H. K., Schmid, J., Niessner, R., Ivleva, N. P., & Laforsch, C. (2012). A novel, highly efficient method for the separation and quantification of plastic particles in sediments of aquatic environments. Limnology and oceanography: methods, 10(7), 524-537.