Metagenomics is an important
tool in allowing us to quickly determine which genes are present communities, this
revolutionary tool was used to discover a ‘new’ type of rhodopsin in microbial
communities (Proteorhodopsin), previous to this, scientist knew about bacteriorhodopsins,
in the membranes of archaea (halobacterium genus) for some time, but considered
it to be a unique feature to this extremely halophilic archaea (C.
B. Munn & Azam, 2011). Studies
on Proteorhodopsins (PR) revealed that the bacteria were using PR as a novel
way to syntheses ATP, without fixing CO2. This gave scientists some
indication that cells may use this mechanism to survive in periods of resource
deprivation, yet the wide reaching dispersal of this protein (discovered using
GOS) suggests there may be other use or a major physiological benefit of Proteorhodopsins.
The discovery of PR was followed by a
number of studies which attempted to determine the variation, function and
mechanism of PR’s (Beja et al. (2001),
Walter et al. (2007), Gomez-Consarnau
et al. (2010)), this studies gave
great framework on how PR work, showing PR as a survival mechanism, by synthesising
ATP directly from light energy. Wanting to further explore the distribution
especially in polar regions which represent some of the harshest conditions on
the planet Nguyen et al. (2015) conducted an ambitious 8-month study, spanning
the entire polar winter, aiming to report the seasonal occurrence and diversity
of the proteorhodopsin (PR) expression in the polar oceans.
An interesting seasonal pattern of PR
expression was discovered with a decreased expression from early to late
winter, which indicated a reduced functional usage of PR’s in the darkness of
the winters, although the expression of PR’s never ceased. This sustained
expression suggesting that the bacterium can regulate PR expression rather than
being constituently expressed. Beginning to give us more insight into the
purpose of this protein in the cells, initially used for ATP synthesis as a
secondary synthesis mechanism in low nutrient conditions, but when light is restricted
PR may continue to be useful for non-ATP forming functions, which could include
environmental biosensing or as a transport mechanism for small solutes. Throughout
the polar winter Gammaproteobacteria like-PR sequences were dominant, but
surprisingly there was a transition in the second most common sequences from Flavobacteria-like PR in early
winter to Alphaproteobacteria-like PR in late winter, following carbon dynamics
where patterns in expression were consistent with community succession, as identified
by DNA community fingerprinting. This displacement of one type of PR for
another may suggest that the different ecotypes of PR that exist give the
microbes it belongs to a different niche in the ecosystem, and creates
competition between species when they are exposed to harsh conditions for a
sustained period of times, giving some microbes a physiological edge and
allowing one or two species to dominate, shifting community dynamics.
This
paper offers us great insight into how cells use PR’s to exploit biological
resources at times where survival is difficult and competition maybe high,
although the findings and the pattern of expression over the year are clear, it
brings few definite answers to how and why bacteria use PR’s, although
suggesting at increased survival under harsh conditions no mechanism has been
proposed. The multifunctional of this protein is a topic which needs to be addressed
to give clear answers on the purpose of this protein other than ATP synthesis,
which will allow us to being to discover the further complexity of microbial
metabolism and survival especially in harsh conditions such as the polar
winters.
References
Reviewed paper: Nguyen, D., Maranger, R., Balagué, V., Coll-Lladó, M.,
Lovejoy, C., & Pedrós-Alió, C. (2015). Winter diversity and expression of
proteorhodopsin genes in a polar ocean. The ISME Journal, 9(8),
1835–1845. doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.1. http://www.nature.com/ismej/journal/v9/n8/abs/ismej20151a.html
Béjà, O., Spudich, E. N., Spudich, J. L., Leclerc, M., & DeLong, E.
F. (2001). Proteorhodopsin phototrophy in the ocean. Nature, 411(6839),
786–789. doi:10.1038/35081051
Gómez-Consarnau, L., Akram, N., Lindell, K., Pedersen, A., Neutze, R.,
Milton, D. L., … Pinhassi, J. (2010). Proteorhodopsin Phototrophy promotes
survival of marine bacteria during starvation. PLoS Biology, 8(4),
e1000358. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000358
Munn, C. B., & Azam, F. (2011). Marine microbiology: Ecology
and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Bios Scientific Publ.
Walter, J. M., Greenfield, D., Bustamante, C., & Liphardt, J.
(2007). Light-powering Escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(7), 2408–2412.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0611035104
Hello,
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think was the cause of the shift in microbial dominance during between early and late winter? Is there any suggestions in the paper as to why Gammaproteobacteria PR sequences were dominant?
Chloe
Hi Chloe,
ReplyDeletein this paper i couldn't see any reasoning behind the shift, the only reason i could think of personally is that some microbes are more resilient to the winter conditions and they are using the proteorhodopsin something else which increased survival rate. I'm not sure if there is further research into this or not, it is a point that i pondered on myself, i think i will go and try dig into the papers to try and answer this question.
Thanks for bringing this up as the moment it seems to be an interesting observation, which maybe there for a variety of reasons, and i would like to find the answer to myself.
Natasha