Recent studies have shown that there are quite a few marine bacteria with the enzymatic potential of QQ. Zheng et al. (2016) conducted a study with focus on the Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). The main focus of this study was to compare the bacterial composition of different health statuses. Further, they looked at the bacterial composition of distinct larval stages. 240 bacterial strains where identified in total with a significant shift between samples from healthy and diseased populations and also within different growth stages.
What I found most
interesting was that they screened the 143 strains which they isolated from
healthy shrimp and water samples for their AHL degrading activity. 18 out of
143 strains showed reduction of the normalized β-galactosidase activity. The AHL level is proportional
to β-galactosidase
activity. Ten out of 18 strains showed strong AHL degrading potential. The
dominant species with strong degrading potential were Tenacibaculum mesophilum (nine
strains) and
Microbacterium aquimaris (two
strains). They suggest that the identified bacteria with strong degrading
potential could potentially be test to control diseases in aquaculture.
In my opinion these findings are
very promising. Previous studies have revealed that the use of organisms with the
potential of QQ can be an effective way to block QS systems of bacteria. E.g.
QQ can be used to control biofilm formation and therefore prevent biofouling (Joint et al. 2007). Additionally,
the author mentioned recent studies where QQ was successfully applied to marine
organisms such as the giant freshwater prawn. Anyway, further research is necessary.
More bacteria with QQ potential for other farmed species have to be identified.
Further, the efficiency in commercial aquaculture has yet to be proven.
If you are interested in that topic: I found two useful reviews
about QQ enzymes and QQ marine agents:
Tang et al. (2014), Quorum Quenching Agents: Resources for
Antivirulence Therapy, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4071575/
Chen et al. (2013), Quorum Quenching Enzymes and Their
Application in Degrading Signal Molecules to Block Quorum Sensing-Dependent
Infection, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794736/
And here’s the reference for this article:
Zheng Y., Yu M., Liu Y., Su Y., Xu T., Yu M., Zhang X.
(2016) Comparison of cultivable bacterial communities associated with Pacific
white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larvae at different health statuses and
growth stages, Aquaculture,doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.09.020
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848615301794
Hi Nuri, this is a really interesting paper! I think this is a great start to some exciting new research in aquaculture. Was there any mention of how the bacteria which had the potential to degrade AHL signals could be used? Would their numbers need to be increased in the normal gut microbiota? And if so, could this easily be done by the use of probiotics?
ReplyDeleteWas there any mention of the mechanisms behind the degradation by these bacteria? It would be interesting to see if there are products or compounds produced by these bacteria which are involved in the degradation process which could be synthesized to add to diets used in aquaculture.
Great review
Hi Laura,
ReplyDeletesorry for the late reply. Unfortunately, they paper rather focused on the general bacterial community. They didn't say anything about how the bacteria could be used or if that could be done by the use of probiotics.
The degradation mechanisms are usually based on certain QQ enzymes. Several bacteria with QQ potential have been indentified yet, but only a few QQ enzymes. I guess it would be very costly to isolate the enzymes. I would suggest to investigate if the bacteria with QQ potential have any negative side effects on the treated species. If not you could start a feeding trial with different diet compositions and challenge each treatment with the particular pathogen.