Diseases in fish can be cause by a wide array of infectious
agents, however, currently emerging are increasing issues with diseases cause
by true fungal and fungal-like pathogens. Disease caused by such pathogens is
increasing in incidence, geographic range and virulence in recent years and so
poses a global biodiversity threat. At this time though the underlying causes
of this observed increase are not known and so it is vital to further
understanding of the ecological factors driving such change.
A review paper by Gozlan et al therefore attempts to collate
information on the current understanding of such fungal pathogens, in order to
highlight not only what may be causing infections, but also what direction
research should take in order to minimise the ecosystem impacts. This is with
the hopes that it may aid in the control of the increasingly infectious
outbreaks of disease that have, in places, caused local extinctions.
The review states that the majority of infections in fish
caused by fungi are caused by species in the phylum Ascmycota and that, most
importantly, the majority of these fungi are opportunistic pathogens. In addition
to this, within a clade of fungal-like organisms, the Mesomycetozoea, there are
some notable pathogens within the clade Dermocystida, such as Sphaerothecum destruens, which can
infect a wide range of hosts. Finally there are a number of oomycete parasites
of fish which morphologically resemble fungi but are taxonomically distinct.
One of the most important things to take from this study is
the generalist nature of such pathogens. It states that all three grouping
of fungi and fungal-like organisms
contain pathogens that are true generalist. This ability to infect and cause
disease in fishes across often drives high virulence in vulnerable hosts, and
is what makes these diseases such a threat to global fish populations. The study
of these diseases therefore becomes imperative, especially given that the
current method for getting rid of the diseases in aquaculture is through the
use of culling. As such, the review proposes the use of up to date molecular methods
like Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and PCR to examine the microbial
species causing disease.
The power of this study lies in its collaborative nature. By
bringing together a wide range of current knowledge on the subject of fungal
and fungal-like pathogens it is able to highlight just how little
epidemiological data there is for fish pathogens. And, since the fisheries
sector employs 33.1 million people, these diseases can be considered a significant
threat to a vital ecosystem service. When coupling this with their evidently
generalist nature, it is not unfair to suggest that such diseases are emerging
as a major concern for global fish populations, thus meaning their study is of
great importance.
Gozlan, R. E, Marshall, W. L, Lilje, O,
Jessop, C. N, Gleason, F. H. and Andreou, D. (2014). Current ecological
understanding of fungal-like pathogens of fish: what lies beneath?. Frontiers in Microbiology. 5,
Article 62.
Hi Abi,
ReplyDeleteInteresting review which seems to have covered a lot! I think its quite surprising and concerning that the fungi seem to be so generalist. Did they discuss the most common mechanism of infection used by the fungi? Do you think this review will help to identify methods of mediating outbreaks of fungal infection in the future?
Hi Kat,
DeleteThe paper is fairly unclear on the mechanism of infection as it seems to be one of the things that still isn't properly understood as they aren't sure which fungal life stages are virulent. It says that transmission of the diseases are not well understood but it does implicate carnivory as a way of acquiring the parasite in some circumstances. I definitely think it should be helpful in identifying the pathogens, particularly with the molecular techniques it proposes. However, in terms of controlling the outbreaks i'm not sure that enough is known yet seeing as the only current method of control is to cull an entire infected population.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete