Bacterial
diseases are a major problem of marine aquaculture. High mortality of marine
fish larvae especially, has been frequently attributed to Vibrio infections (esp. Vibrio
alginolyticus). The excessive use of antibiotics in the past has led to
spreading of resistant strains, and other techniques such as vaccination are
not suitable for larval phases. There is therefore a need to find new methods
to tackle the problem of diseases. Probiotics are microbial cells provided via
the diet or rearing water that benefits the host condition improving the microbial
balance of the organism and the resistance to diseases. It might be an interesting
alternative to traditional administrations of antibiotics, especially for the
more sensitive larvae phase.
Strains of the lactic acid
bacteria (LAB) were previously used as effective probiotics in, carps, eel, sea
bass, and rainbow trout. Surprisingly most studies using LABs as aquaculture
probiotics have employed non-marine strains, although marine strains may actually
present the advantage of being adapted to salinity and therefore be able to
compete with pathogenic strains in euryaline fish farming and mariculture. Garcés et
al. (2015) assessed the probiotic properties and the protective mode of
action of the marine strain Lactobacillus
pentosus H16 against V. alginolyticus
03/8525 on Artemia franciscana. Artemia
are commonly used as live feeds in fish and crustacean larvae aquaculture and
are also important aquatic models to study host-microbial interactions.
The strain L. pentosus H16 was isolated from the intestinal tract of hake (Merluccius hubbsi) collected of the
coast of Argentina. Tests of antimicrobial activity indicated that L. pentosus H16 selectively adheres to
mucosal surfaces displacing pathogenic strains such as Vibrio alginolyticus 03/8525 and Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida
ATCC 33658. In addition to its antimicrobial activity, L. pentosus H16 was shown to produce cell-bound bio surfactants,
confirming H16`s competitive advantages against pathogens.
Probiotic capability of H16 when
bioencapsulated in Artemia was testes
in vivo, and experiments confirmed that H16 protects Artemia nauplii of mortality caused by V. alginolyticus 03/8525. These findings suggest that it is
possible to use live carriers in H16 administration, for example to prevent
infections at larval phases – an interesting but scarcely explored alternative
to administer probiotics.
According to this study, L.
pentosus H16 is a promising probiotic for Artemia culture and has also the potential for other aquaculture
activities such as larvae culture and fish farming. For further research I
would suggest investigating of how effective encapsulated H16 in Artemia is when fed to organisms. It
would be interesting to know if whether it is the healthier food, or the
probiotic itself that could enhance larvae survival of farmed animals.
Garcés ME, Sequeiros C, Olivera NL (2015) Marine Lactobacillus
pentosus H16 protects Artemia franciscana from Vibrio
alginolyticus pathogenic effects. Diseases
of Aquatic Organisms 113: 41–50
Hi Tabea, thanks for the interesting post. I agree that marine derived probiotics would probably be more beneficial than other sources, but as we know one of the biggest hurdles is the costs involved. It seems as if they're only just starting to research this as a possible probiotic so I'm sure it be a fairly long time before this is seen commercially, if it ever is.
ReplyDeleteAs Ben mentioned, the costs of bringing a new probiotic on the market are very high. For it to be worth it, the benefits need to outweigh the costs. Does the paper mention how L. pentosus H16 compares to other probiotics currently on the on the market?
ReplyDeleteHi Maria and Ben
DeleteThanks for the comments. Yes I am aware of the costs, especially after Dans last lecture a few weeks ago. However I am not sure if this would be the same for Artemia and fish? I think we have to be especially careful with using probiotics encapsulated into food, as it might actually just be the healthier food that could enhance the fed ones health, and maybe there are much easier ways to provide healthy Artemia (food).
The paper did not mention anything about alternatives to H16 compounds, I assume thats propably mostly due to the lack of present studies.
Thanks