Rearing organisms in the laboratory can be a delicate
process. Some are hardier than others but there are ways of boosting
survivability rates. The larval period is often the most vulnerable of the life
cycle and poor environmental conditions or food can negatively affect body size
and development. Marine organisms are especially at risk due to their
osmoregulatory function. The constant ingestion of the water around them means
they don’t have much choice in what microflora they’re taking in. In fact, the
bacteria they first ingest is what primarily colonises their once-sterile
digestive tract. And they better be happy about what they’ve got because, even
after metamorphosis occurs, those are the ones that stick around. Therefore,
having a healthy microflora gives the developing larvae a higher chance of
survival compared with those that don’t.
This is where probiotics come into play, Bacillus sp. being of particular
interest to Hauville et al. (2015)
due to its spore-forming ability. Spores are sensitive to environment changes
despite their inactive metabolism and are resistant to physical/chemical
stress, are heat stable and can survive in low pH. This coupled with their low
productive cost means that it’s very cheap and easy to produce lots in labs
with minimal effort. Previous studies have found that introduction of Bacillus can cause an increase in gene
expression associated with growth metabolism and animal welfare, whilst others
show the potential for increased resistance to vibrios. In this one, Hauville et al. (2015) test the effects of a
commercial mix of Bacillus on growth
and digestive enzyme in Florida pompano, common snook and red drum larvae.
In the control, all three organisms were fed rotifers
enriched with Algamac 3050. In treatment 1 (PB) the rotifers were enriched with
Algamac 3050 and also a commercial mix of 0.5g of Bacillus spp. per litre. Treatment 2 (PB+) consisted of the same as
treatment 1 but with an additional 5g m-3 of probiotics.
The results showed no significant difference in survival
between treatments and species, but survival was significantly higher in
pompano and red drum compared with snook larvae. PB and PB+ pompano larvae had
significantly greater standard length and body depth than the pompano control
and the same occurred for snook larvae although there was no significant
difference in body length. Red drum showed no differenced observed between the
treatments. Although for some reason, the authors don’t go on to describe what
difference occurs in common snook which is odd. For pompano, it was found that the
counts of colony forming units (CFU) per larvae were higher on marine agar
media for PB and PB+ when compared with the control. The lack of
description occurs again for snook and red drum where no comparisons are made
and in table 2 it shows only pompano being tested for CFU. It seems incomplete
to only include one species. The number of vibrios on the TCBS media were low
and there was no significant difference between treatments. In terms of enzyme
activity, pompano and snook showed trypsin specific activities which were
significantly higher in PB and PB+ in comparison to the control. Amylase
activity was different only in snook, with PB+ higher than in the control.
Alkaline phosphatase (AP) of pompano (PB and PB+) and snook (PB+) was higher
than their controls.
The results show that Bacillus
as a probiotic has beneficial effects on growth and digestive enzyme activity.
The Bacillus mix given for this study
involved three different strains; B.
pumilus, B. lichenformis and B.
amyloliquefaciens and are all known to be closely related to B. subtilis. These strains have
different metabolic abilities. B. pumilus
produces amylase and cellulose whilst also having strong inhibition factors
against Vibrio sp. and B. lichenformis has antiviral properties
and B. amyloliquefaciens is closely
related to B. subtilis. Hauville et al. (2015) discuss previous studies
where B. subtilis, B. lichenformis or
B. pumilus were added to the diet of
olive flounder. B. subtilis enhanced
growth, B. subtilis and B. pumilus increased survival rate and B. pumilus and B. lichenformis increase superoxide dismutase activity and disease
resistance. This showed how beneficial it was to supplement the diets with
multiple strains of the bacteria simultaneously.
This paper is looking at the benefit of using Bacillus sp. as a probiotic in three
different organisms, but in many of their tables and figures they only include
comparisons with either one, or two and use a different table or figure for
another. This seems a very convoluted way of presenting the information rather
than just using separate comparison tables for e.g. standard body length and specific
activities separately. However, it could be due to the fact that there were no
statistical differences observed in red drum larvae as opposed to snook and
pompano.
Ref; Hauville, M. R., Zambonino-Infante, J. L., Gordon Bell, J.,
Migaud, H. & Main, K. L. (2015) Effects of a mix of Bacillus sp. as a potential probiotic for Florida pompano, common
snook and red drum larvae performances and digestive enzyme activities. Aquaculture nutrition.
doi:
10.1111/anu.12226
Hi Bekki,
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to look at these papers, even without significant difference there is much to learn. Did you by any chance come across any other papers which addressed Bacillus sp as a probiotic? it would be interesting to see the effects in other larvae types, which may have different bacterial communities. As different bacterial communities could be affected differently by probiotics. What do you think?