Thursday, 8 January 2015

Like a virginica... touched for the very first time.

Identification of potential general markers of disease resistance in American oysters, Crassostrea virginica through gene expression studies.

Nikapitiya et al., (2014).

The American oyster, Crassostrea virginica, is an economically and ecologically important bivalve species in the Atlantic coasts of North America and the Gulf of Mexico. Development of intensive harvesting has led to reduced water quality, disease and habitat degradation, and therefore, significant declines of this species. During the larval and juvenile stages, oysters are susceptible to bacterial pathogens and have been described as the cause of mass mortality events in this species. Several Vibrio species can cause extensive bivalve larval mortality in hatcheries in many shellfish growing regions within hours of exposure. Probably the most well known bacterium is Roseovarius crassostreae, also a causative agent of juvenile oyster disease, being coined as Roseovarius oyster disease (ROD). This bacterium affects the juvenile stages of oysters (< 25 mm in shell length), leading to high seasonal mortality rates. However, adult oysters are susceptible to disease also; the protistan parasite Perkinsus marinus is a major cause of mortality in adult C. virginica. Several approaches are used to manage oyster diseases; careful site selection, frequent monitoring of shellfish condition and water quality to name a few. Knowledge of environmental conditions that can trigger disease outbreaks affecting host susceptibility help schedules the timing of deployment and harvesting. Several lines of oysters resistant to disease have been produced by traditional selective breeding practices, however, little is known about the mechanisms underlying the disease resistance.

Recently, cDNA microarray technology and transcriptomic analyses have been used to characterise gene expression patterns in tissues of Crassostrea gigas and C. virginica exposed to several environmental stressors; bacteria, protozoans, hypoxia, pesticides and hyperthermia. Analysis of gene expression patterns in resistant and susceptible oysters (RSOs) in response to these challenges could provide potential biomarkers and would be a useful tool in environmental monitoring and disease management. Previous work (McDowell et al., 2014) provided a list of gene candidates that could be associated with disease resistance or susceptibility to ROD and were used in this study. By identifying genes involved in the early responses of oysters to the protozoan parasite, P. marinus and by focusing on several novel and previously annotated candidate genes, Nikapitiya et al., (2014) were attempting to provide insight into the immune responses of RSOs to a variety of pathogenic challenges and ultimately, identification of biomarkers associated with disease in C. virginica.

Donated bacterial and parasitic isolates were cultured overnight at 28 °C in 10 mL YP3 broth with agitation, following centrifugation and re-suspension. Suspensions were diluted to the required dose to be used in three challenge experiments; Roseovarius crassostreae, Vibrio tubiashii and Perkinsus marinus. Depending on the bacterium that the C. virginica was being exposed to, varied methods were used during the three challenges regarding concentration, exposure and RNA extraction time. RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis was performed by selecting random samples and then being diluted and kept at - 20 °C until used for gene expression studies. To evaluate the gene expression, quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed in duplicate for each gene. For the R. crassostreae challenge, a t-test was used to compare levels of fold-changes in gene expression relative to unchallenged controls between RSOs. Log-rank survival analysis was used to analyse differences in survival curves between oyster families. Differences in cumulative percent mortality between susceptible and control oysters at selected time points were also determined using Pearson's chi-squared test with Bonferroni corrections. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine effect of time and treatment on gene expression. Independent sample t-test was performed to compare levels of gene expression for each gene between controls and experimentally challenged oysters at each time point. For the P. marinus challenge experiment, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed for at all-time points to determine relationships between levels of gene expression for all genes and P. marinus spore numbers in hemolymph.

The overall results (far too many to mention in this review) of this study has led to the identification of candidates for general markers (applicable to multiple diseases) of disease resistance; serine protease inhibitor (SPIs). Alongside this, biomarkers that may be associated with an unsuccessful immune response in oysters, has been determined by the inability of the oysters showing high levels of expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and histone H4 (HIS4). Nikapitiya et al., (2014) tried to overcome the complexity in oyster responses to environmental and pathogenic challenges as well as biological variability through several strategies. SPIs are important in oyster immune defences, probably by direct inhibition of pathogen proteases. Patterns of gene expression of HSP70 and HIS4, showing that oysters with the highest levels of expression of these genes on day one after P. marinus challenge suffered the highest P. marinus load at the end of the challenge, confirm previous findings suggesting that these molecules, in particular HSP70, may be associated with disease susceptibility, and could be used as biomarkers of stress and/or an unsuccessful immune response. The results from the R. crassostreae challenge, showing significantly higher levels of HSP70 in susceptible oysters than in resistant oysters, as well as the results from the V. tubiashii challenge in adult oysters, showing no significant changes in HSP70 or HIS4 expression in oysters able to clear this bacterial infection, supports this hypothesis.


The end result of Nikapitiya et al’s., (2014) study provides further information on the role of several molecules in immune responses in oysters and providing further evidence supporting the potential use of SPIs as a general marker of resistance to bacterial and parasitic diseases, and simultaneously, the use of HSP70 and HIS4 as markers of disease susceptibility in oysters. I believe that this study will provide the foundations in how the culture of American oysters will be regulated for future stocks by identifying markers for selection and insights into immune responses in oysters.

References

McDowell, I.C., Nikapitiya, C., Aguiar, D., Lane, C.E., Istrail, S., & Gomez-Chiarri, M. (2014) 'Transcriptome of American oysters, Crassostrea virginica, in response to bacterial challenge: insights into potential mechanisms of disease resistance' PLoS ONE 9(8): e105097. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105097

Nikapitiya, C., McDowell, I.C., Villamil, L., Munoz, P., Sohn, S., & Gomez-Chiarri, M. (2014) 'Identification of potential general markers of disease resistance in American oysters, Crassostrea virginica through gene expression studies' Fish & Shellfish Immunology 41: 27-36.

8 comments:

  1. First of all, the title drew me to your post- very funny! Thanks for the read, I was just wondering- do you think the use of this technique in using very small molecules as biomarkers will be very time effective? Just trying to piece together how this could be used in commercial industries. Would you have to run genetic analysis on every oyster? I may have the wrong end of the stick here, let me know :)!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am glad you like the title, I do try!

    Good question and I have had another look at the method just to pick out if they have reported on the number of oysters and they haven't, funnily enough. However, I am assuming that it was in substantial numbers due to the random sampling.

    Regarding time effectiveness, take heat shock proteins (in particular, HSP70) for example, this has been termed as a 'universal' biomarker, and the fact that this gene expression is quantifiable very quickly when a whole range of stresses occur (temperature, salinity increase, metal pollution etc), I believe it is very effective. Techniques such as qPCR can be implemented at a reasonable rate.
    Going by what the authors have written with regards to susceptibility in oysters, I feel that they were reporting something already well known because as I have said before, HSP’s are known for their important process when it comes to stress in organisms.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Dean, Thankyou for the informative reply! Weird they didn't report how many samples they made. I agree that the laboratory technique is very clever and effective, however what I mean regarding effectiveness is I am really thinking on how they physically take samples from the oysters. Is it via tissue samples? Thanks! E

    ReplyDelete
  4. Apologies for my misunderstanding, various extraction methods were performed, dependent on the challenge: -

    Roseovarius crassostreae challenge
    Genomic DNA isolated from bacteria collected from the inner side of the shell of recently dead oysters using a sterile cotton swab dipped in filtered sterile sweater (FSSW). Whole body was collected from 5 juvenile oysters from each treatment.

    Vibrio tubiashii (VT) & Perkinsus marinus (PM) challenge
    Sampling of oyster hemolymph was performed, (VT = 0.7-1 mL; PM = 1 mL) collecting from the adductor muscle sinus of each individual oyster.

    Also, I have seen with fresh (aka coffee infused) eyes that in the V. tubiashii challenge, a total of 95 samples were used; non-challenged controls (n = 15), FSSW challenge (n = 40), and V. tubiashii challenge (n = 40). In the P. marinus challenge, 20 samples; 2 control and 2 challenged (n = 5 per tank). However, there isn’t any mention of numbers for the R. crassostreae challenge.


    Another thing I have noticed, different populations of oysters were used for each challenge; V. tubiashii = Northeastern Hybrid American oysters, R. crassostreae = samples from a previous study, and P. marinus = Dermo-free adult American oysters provided by Taylor Shellfish. This is slightly worrying to me as they haven’t cross referenced any of the bacteria with the different populations.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Dean- no worries, I don't think I made it very clear myself!
    Thank-you for clearing this all up and the sample numbers. It's funny how the more you read some papers, the more you realise how it could have been done better like you have done here. What do you mean by not cross referencing any of the bacteria? Thankyou!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Dean,

    Interesting paper and I would support the use of these molecular methods as they can be deployed extremely rapidly and can give really interesting data on responses of an organism, even before they are exhibited in the phenotype and with much higher sensitivity. Saying that mRNA, does not always translate directly into proteins so its something worth baring in mind when looking at these kinds of studies. It would be interesting to look at the levels of actual proteins as well. I would recommend reading Sorenson J., G., 2010. Application of heat shock protein expression for detecting natural adaptions and exposure to stress in natural populations. Current Zoology, 56(6), 703-713, 2010. If you want more information.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Dean,
    Interesting post, I was wandering, it seems to me that they are working on the adult oysters - which as you said were susceptible to disease like most things, but in the start you mentioned that there are mass mortality events in the juveniles - are they looking into the disease in the juveniles as well using these techniques?
    Also was there any mention of what environmental conditions trigger the disease?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry for the delayed response guys!

    Tom, thanks for your comment and pointing me in the direction of that journal, I completely agree with what you are saying. Given the fact that HSPs are very complex and expression can adapt over seasons or even days, calls for various levels to be looked at. Results do not always show linear relationships between climate and geographical region with HSP expression. Even factors that you are looking into for your dissertation such as life stages and the passing down of adaptive traits genetically are what make this a very complicated, yet interesting field.

    Kat, yes sorry, juveniles were used in the Roseovarius crassostreae challenge only. That probably has something to do with the fact that they did not use the same strain for each population of oyster used.

    ReplyDelete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.