It is a well-known fact that there has been
a significant decrease in coral populations worldwide (Harvell et al., 1999).
A study done by Ritchie (2006), looked at
the mucus layer formed by the Elkhorn coral Acropora
palmata. This species is highly susceptible to environmental stressors. The
mucus layer is known to protect the corals from stressors in such ways as
presenting a physical barrier, removal of microbes via ingestion and sloughing
etc. However, little is known about the use of this mucus layer as a protector
against disease.
This study by Ritchie (2006) looked at
whether the coral mucus layer gives coral antibiotic resistance due to the
bacteria associated with it providing antibiotic activity. An experimental
approach was also used to look at the potential of mucus as a selection medium
for coral symbionts. A symbiont in this case refers to bacteria that benefits
from the coral mucus, whilst also benefitting the coral.
12 colonies of A.palmata were used. Bacteria samples were taken from the mucus and
then diluted in seawater, plated on glycerol artificial seawater agar and kept
at 24°C. Potentially invasive microbes were introduced which were known to
be related to coral disease. Antibiotic producing corals were selected for and
mucus associated bacteria were then used to test for the production of anti-bacterial
compounds.
A.palmata
has been documented as one of the worst affected
corals worldwide, now listed as a threatened species. The study done by Ritchie
(2006) shows the mucus from A.palmata can
provide antibiotic resistance against gram positive and negative bacteria, a
variety of microbes and from a pathogen associated with white pox disease. A.palmata associate with bacteria that
can produce some sort of antibiotic resistance, showing that microbes play a
key role in the protective properties of the mucus. It also has a role in the
control of the associated microbes. A very interesting result showed that mucus
collected at periods of increased sea surface temperature showed a decrease in
antibiotic activity, suggesting temporal variability in mucus protection
against stressors (Ritchie 2006).
This variability in antibiotic resistance
due to temporal and spatial variability would be a very interesting subject for
future work to look into (Ritchie, 2006). This is obviously a very important
and current topic due to corals becoming subject to immediate environmental
stressors. Therefore it would be very interesting to look at how the antibiotic
activity varies under different conditions in order to predict possible effects
on natural populations. The fact that the environmental stressors are only
going to become more intense only makes this subject of more importance.
Ritchie,K. (2006) Regulation of microbial
populations by coral surface mucus and mucus-associated bacteria. Marine
Ecology Progress Series. 322 , 1-14.
Harvell, C., Kim, K., Burkholder,
J., Colwell, R., Epstein, P., Grimes, D., Hoffmann, E., Lipp, E., Osterhaus,
A., Overstreet, R., Porter, J., Smith, G., Vasta, G. (1999). Emerging
Marine Diseases: Climate Links and Anthropogenic Factors. Science. 285,
1505-1510.
Hi Sam,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the interesting post. I see that they only mentioned the effects of heat on the antibiotic activity. It would be interesting to see how other physical factors could influence it as well such as UV radiation or dissection.
Hi Sam,
ReplyDeleteWere the coral also exposed to more than one invasive microbe at any one time? In a natural environment the coral will probably be exposed to more than one microbe. The relationships between these microbes and the coral could potentially have additive effects and increase spread of disease or maybe competition between the microbes may reduce the fitness and thus reduce their detrimental effects.