So far in this blog, many of the posts have been on studies
done on microbes from the present day oceans. The focus of this post is the fossilized
marine diatoms from the Late Quaternary, when there were abrupt changes in the
climate. Geology’s underpinning principle is that the world preserved in the
fossil record operated in the same way/ or at least it was fairly similar to
the one today. I think that by using this principle and the fossil record, the
future of oceans may become slightly clearer. I hope to promote geological
records of marine microbes as a useful part of the study of how marine microbes
could be affected by climate change.
Data that had been previously reported by a couple of separate
studies was used. They focused on the ecological response of diatom communities
by measuring the diatom communities at different Heinrich events (the end of glaciations).
They used 14C and benthic delta 18O isotopes to date the
samples. To study the diatoms they used qualitive
and quantitive analysis (they counted them) at x1000 magnification. Analysis
was carried out using the Jaccard index which quantifies the similarity between
communities, in terms of taxonomic composition and the BC similarity index
which does the same but gives weighting to the abundance of the species
measured. Cooling episodes match with periods of increased wind, upper-ocean
mixing and diatom productivity. Chaetoceros is a genus of diatoms which
requires high levels of turbulence for growth; therefore these are used as
indicators in the fossil record for intense wind conditions and mixing.
They found that higher nutrient availability increased the
total diatom abundance and probably increased the relative contribution of
diatoms to slow growing phytoplankton. Also that diatom abundance and species richness
reduced by more than 50% during the change in climate. Data analysis showed
that numbers and species richness rapidly recovered after hydrographic
conditions were re-established. They found this pattern repeatedly during/after
the Heinrich events.
No counts for Coccolithophores were available for these cores
but the relative dominance can be suggested by the percentages of opal and
calcium carbonated in the marine sediments. Enhanced wind intensity and
upper-ocean mixing the percentage of opal in sediments increased in respect to
calcium carbonate giving the competitive advantage to siliceous plankton,
however the warmer climates weakened the global atmospheric gradients and the intensity
of the wind decreased causing diatom abundance to decrease.
By using the BC similarity index they could weight the most
dominant species found that, usually, there is a locally dominant fauna which
would have large numbers, these would be susceptible to local extinction
events, which is why there was large species richness in the rare species, as
they would not be impacted as much by local effects.
The authors conclude that the diatoms have shown the enormous
potential for recovery and that diatoms have been stable and resilient in the
past 10,000 years despite any abrupt changes in climate and hydrograqphic
conditions. In reference to the coming changes in global warming, the authors
suggest that the microbial community of the oceans will be affected by these
changes. However they will retain the ability to bounce back if conditions are
restored.
Cermeño,
Pedro, Emilio Marañón, and Oscar E. Romero. "Response of marine diatom
communities to Late Quaternary abrupt climate changes." Journal of
Plankton Research (2012): 35, 12-21.
http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/10/18/plankt.fbs073.short
Hi Sam, I was wondering, when you say abrupt how abrupt do you mean? I think these kind of studies are great and get round the problem of the exceptionally short-term studies trying to predict long-term trends (although you can get less information). But we are looking at a minimum 2 degrees (its probably going to be more) of climate change by the end of the century. How does the speed of these changes compare?
ReplyDeleteHi Sam
ReplyDeleteI think that it's amazing that diatoms appear to be fairly resilient to changes in climate and that rarer species were less impacted by these changes and so showed greater diversity than dominant species. I was just wondering what the change was in climate that caused a 50% decline in diatom abundance and species richness, whether it was a period of increased warming or cooling?
Thanks :)
Anita