Monday 10 October 2016

Viral Infection? No Hux Given.

Bloom forming algae are important in global carbon and sulphur cycles due to the production of dimethylated sulphur species (DSS) such as dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP) and dimethylsulphide (DMS). These compounds eventually form cloud condensation nuclei which, as the name suggests, provide the basis for cloud formation, and can significantly alter the earth’s radiation budget. Emiliania huxleyi forms large, dense blooms annually and these blooms produce a huge amount of DSS. Generally, the blooms end as a result of host-specific viral infection, in this case by E. huxleyi Virus (EhV).
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that by 2100 sea surface temperature will have increased by 1.5-3­oC, yet the effect of this increase in temperature on host-virus interactions had been unexplored until Kendrick et al remedied this in 2014. In the study they inoculated bottles of growth media with axenic cultures of E. huxleyi CCMP 374, and kept half at 18oC and half at 21oC, to represent the predicted increased in sea surface temperature. Cultures were infected with EhV86 when they had attained a cell density comparable to that of a typical bloom, and were thereafter sampled daily to measure various parameters including culture density, viral abundance, burst size, and total DMSP (DMSPt). A series of experiments was also carried out using six different E. huxleyi strains to see if the temperature effect was shared.
Kendrick et al ensured that the increase in temperature was affecting the host’s susceptibility to infection, rather than directly affecting the infectivity of the virus by incubating EhV86 isolates at 18oC and 21oC and then using these to infect E. huxleyi 374 growing at 18oC. Burst size (number of viral progeny per lysed host cell) was significantly higher in both treatments than in the controls, indicating that exposing EhVs to increased temperature alone does not affect infectivity.
In the 18oC treatment, successful viral adsorption is seen – where over 24 hours virus density initially decreases as the virions contact and cross the host plasma membrane, then increases at around 4 hours post-infection as viral progeny are released. In the 21oC treatment this pattern in virus density is not seen, and this is explained due to changes in the cell membrane which prevent the virions from binding or crossing the membrane. The authors hypothesise that temperature induced changes in cell membrane lipids may be responsible for the viral resistance. Temperature induced resistance did not affect DSS production, but if the resistance lengthens the bloom duration this could possibly affect the total amount of DSS produced which could in turn impact global sulphur cycles.
This is a fascinating study which makes it clear that temperature plays an important role in host-virus interactions and shows how they may change as our global climate changes. As in any lab based experiment, the results may not accurately reflect real life as it lacks microbial ecosystem complexity. Further research into the changes in lipids at different temperatures, and the difference in lipid content or concentration between strains of E. huxleyi, may confirm the mechanism of the viral resistance.

Kendrick B.J., DiTullio G.R., Cyronak T.J., Fulton J.M., Van Mooy B.A.S., Bidle K.D.(2014) Temperature-Induced Viral Resistance in Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae). PLoS ONE 9(11) e112134

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112134

2 comments:

  1. Hi Tabby Figgins,

    Thank you for your post. It’s fascinating that changes to the lipidome could confer viral resistance as well as thermoadaptation! As homeoviscous adaptations to regional differences in temperature alters the membrane lipid composition, do you think that certain Ehux populations from cooler regions would be more susceptible to viral infection than warmer-adapted strains? Or do you think a Red Queen Effect could compensate against regional Ehv strains? The reason I ask is that a recent PNAS paper (Sharoni et al, 2015) has provided evidence that aerosolized Ehv particles can remain infectious and be widely dispersed over tens of kilometres across the ocean surface. Could it be that the regional temperature differences of the Ehux cells would affect the infectivity of dispersed Ehv particles – particularly the introduction of Ehv’s into cooler waters? It’d be great to know what you think. This phenomenon may well play a big role in the connectivity of marine pathogens and global carbon flow.

    Sharoni, S., Trainic, M., Schatz, D., Lehahn, Y., Flores, M. J., Bidle, K. D., ... & Vardi, A. (2015). Infection of phytoplankton by aerosolized marine viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(21), 6643-6647. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/21/6643.short

    Thanks a lot,
    Davis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Davis,

      I'm not sure whether E. huxleyi populations in cooler regions are more susceptible or whether they have adapted differently to cope with the higher infection rate. It would be interesting to see whether the length of Ehux blooms in warmer regions is higher than in cooler regions to shed some light on this.
      This study showed that the temperature doesn't affect the infectivity of Ehv's
      so I don't think aerosolized viral particles would be any more infectious if they were transported to a cooler region. Unless the Red queen hypothesis is in effect, then maybe Ehv's from cooler regions that were spread to warmer regions would be better able to infect the 'less evolved' Ehux populations.

      I hope this answers your questions,

      Thanks

      Tabby


      Delete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.