DMSP is known to act as an
osmoprotectant, cryoprotectant and in some cases a grazing deterrent.
Interestingly, DMSP and its derivatives may have another use, as antioxidants which protect
against oxidative stressors such as high light levels. Sunda
et al., (2002) investigated this by testing DMSP reactivity with the free
radical OH. and production under various oxidative stressors in Emiliania
huxleyi and the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana.
OH. radicals were used
to oxidise DMS to form DMSO, MSNA and MSA in a step-wise manner. DMSP also
oxidised in a similar way. Reaction rates with OH. and cellular
concentrations were worked out for DMSP and MSNA and compared to information from
the literature. It was discovered that DMSP reacts with OH., but
Acrylate and DMS are 20-60x more reactive. DMS also reacts with singlet oxygen
and is lipid soluble, so could protect photosynthetic membranes. Therefore,
cleavage of DMSP by DMSP lyase could increase protection. DMSO and MSNA also
reacted, and with its low solubility DMSO could concentrate to high levels in
the cell.
For the response of production in
the face of oxidative stressors, CO2 and Iron limitation experiments
were firstly conducted in bottles with nutrient enriched seawater. CO2
limitation cultures were grown to high cell volumes to reduce CO2 by
40 times. For Iron limitation, cells were transferred from a medium
containing iron to one without. Cultures were grown and harvested regularly for
measurements of DMSP, DMS, total cell volume, chlorophyll a and APX activities (an enzyme associated
with antioxidant defence) in T. pseudonana. Under both CO2 and iron limitation, T. pseudonana
showed a 20-60x increase in DMSP, increased DMS/cell-volume ratios, and
elevated APX activities with reduced growth and chlorophyll a levels,
indicating they were under oxidative stress. E. hux showed a similar
trend. It would also have been interesting to directly quantify synthesis of
DMSP lyase, to examine if it was upregulated.
For experiments using UV light,
the control culture was grown under fluorescent light (no UV), whereas the UV
treatments were grown in 30% sunlight and exposed to full UV, UV with (more
harmful) UV-B filtered or with (almost) all UV-A and UV-B filtered. Total DMS,
total DMSP, cell volume and cell chlorophyll a were measured. DMSP and DMS production was higher in sunlit
treatments relative to controls, due to exposure to UV light. Interestingly,
DMS and DMSP production peaked when UVB was filtered but UVA was unfiltered,
rather than at full exposure. The authors put this down to production being
underestimated, as increased production may be balanced by consumption of DMSP
and DMS and also photolysis of DMS.
DMS and DMSP production in response to UV highlights a negative
feedback mechanism which directly benefits algae. Increased UV exposure will
lead to higher DMS release, causing increased cloud formation above the bloom,
so shielding the bloom from UV light and oxidative stress. Although, I think the
lower DMS and DMSP levels found at the highest exposures should examined
closely for the idea to be fully vindicated. It could also be interesting to
look at more recent publications to see if Symbiodinium
in coral show similar responses and whether this impacts the ability of coral
to cope with oxidative stress and so bleaching.
Sunda, W. K. D. J., Kieber, D. J., Kiene, R. P.,
& Huntsman, S. (2002). An antioxidant function for DMSP and DMS in marine
algae. Nature, 418,
317-320.