Viruses have a substantial role in the ocean as they shape
the microbial ecosystem and have the potential to affect the flow of energy and
matter in the marine environment. Viral infections resulting in cell lysis lead
to a “short circuit” in the
microbial loop, as bacterial production is being fueled by recycling and
respiration and the amount of organic matter available to macroorganisms
is being reduced (Fuhrman 2000). Viruses use different replication strategies
and grasping the “why” and the “how” behind those is critical to understanding
viral ecology. Let’s start with the “how”.
Viral infections can be lytic: the viral DNA replicates independently
from the host, which results in lysis of the cell (Miller and Day, 2008). Phages
relying solely on this strategy are called virulent. In the lysogenic virus
infections the viral DNA is maintained within the host as a prophage, where it’s
being copied alongside the host’s DNA when the infected cell replicates, until
induced to replicate lytically (Miller and Day, 2008). Viruses using both the
lysogenic and the lytic cycle are called temperate. A great amount of studies
examining the correlation between virus replication strategy and bacterial abundance
and production have been rather inconclusive. Here Brum et al. 2015 demonstrate that temperate viruses dominate the dsDNA
viral assemblage of the western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) in the Southern
ocean, and manage to gain insight into the strategy behind it.
According to the study temperate viruses dominate the WAP
dsDNA viral assemblage primarily using lysogeny when bacterial production is
low (in the spring) and switching to lytic replication in response to increased
bacterial abundance and productivity (in the summer). Moreover, comparative
analysis of viromes revealed that the taxonomic composition of the sequences
unique to temperate and lytic viruses in the WAP was different. Namely,
myoviruses were more abundant in the lytic-enriched virome and podoviruses were
more abundant in temperate-enriched viromes. However, we can’t really talk
about dominant sequences, as 93–95% of the reads remained taxonomically
unassigned. Comparing this research with other studies of viral communities from
lower-latitude marine ecosystems exhibits a difference in the trend in lysogeny.
Higher-latitude environments display strong seasonality in percent lysogeny,
with the highest values in winter and spring, in contrast to lower-latitude
environments where lysogeny is sporadically detected. These trends with
latitude might be explained by the relative abundance of temperate viruses,
which dominate polar aquatic systems, probably because the intense seasonal
variations in productivity in these regions favor viruses capable of switching
replication strategies in response to changes in host productivity. However, it
is important to say that because of the usage of quantitative dsDNA virome
construction and comparison as a main research method this paper does not
provide any data on single-stranded DNA or RNA viruses. Even though this study
is a stepping stone in the understanding of polar viral-ecology, it is still a
baby step in this very wide and unexplored field.
Reviewed paper:
Brum, J., Hurwitz, B., Schofield, O., Ducklow, H., Sullivan,
M. (2015). Seasonal time bombs: dominant temperate viruses affect Southern
Ocean microbial dynamics. In: The ISME Journal (2015), 1–13. doi:
10.1038/ismej.2015.125
References:
Fuhrman, J. (2000). Impact of viruses on bacterial
processes. In: Kirchman DL (ed) Microbial Ecology of the Oceans. Wiley-Liss,
Inc.: New York, NY, USA, pp 327–350.
Miller RV, Day MJ. (2008). Contribution of lysogeny,
pseudolysogeny, and starvation to phage ecology. In: Abedon ST (ed)
Bacteriophage Ecology: Population Growth, Evolution, and Impact of Bacterial
Viruses. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, pp 114–143.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments from external users are moderated before posting.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.