Sunday, 25 November 2018

Microbes munching on microplastics in mangrove mud

Microplastic pollution in marine ecosystems is a contemporary issue that has been at the forefront of environmental research and the media in recent years. Roughly 4.8 million tonnes of plastic enter the marine environment every year with microplastics constituting 92.4% of this waste. Microplastics are often made deliberately for use in cosmetics that then pass through wastewater treatment or by the weathering and breakdown of large plastic debris.

Microplastics have a global ocean distribution and we are still only just beginning to discover the ill effects that they cause to marine animals and environments. Microplastics are often found within filter feeding invertebrates, marine mammals and seabirds causing pathological stress, stunted growth, and false satiation and even facilitate the accumulation of heavy metals in marine sediments. Even with ever-increasing evidence of the damage to marine life microplastics cause, less attention is given to strategies for environmental remediation. Mangrove forests support a high diversity of microbes and are often subjected to high plastic pollution, could members of these microbial communities be a solution to our growing plastic problem?
The aims of the reviewed study were to provide a remediation solution to microplastic polluted environments, using bacterial isolates, and to evaluate the potential of marine bacteria to degrade microplastics.

Microplastic polyethylene, Polypropylene (PP), Polystyrene and Polyethylene terephthalate were collected and treated with UV-radiation. Sediment samples were taken from the top 4 cm from six mangrove forests around the Peninsular Malaysia from which bacteria were isolated, plated onto nutrient agar (NA) and incubated. Pure cultures were obtained after incubation for species identification and plating onto a mineral salt medium (MSM) with the UV-treated microplastics as the only carbon source. Species that could grow on the MSM were inoculated into an MSM broth containing one of the four microplastics and incubated for 40 days. Cell growth was monitored every 10 days and after 40 days microplastic weight loss, the rate of degradation and half-life was calculated. Changes in the plastic structure were assessed by Fourier transform infrared and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Only two isolates obtained from incubation could grow in the presence of plastics, these were Bacillus cereus and Bacillus gottheilii. Both species showed similar growth patterns over the 40-day incubations with exponential growth between day 0 and 20 followed by a die off. However, B. gottheilii could grow in the presence of PP where B. cereus could not. B. gottheilii shows a wider capacity to degrade microplastics than B. cereus while also degrading plastics at a higher rate. Microplastics were also shown to be oxidised when inoculated, these bacterial species are able to alter the chemical structure of plastic polymers to make them easier to adhere to and degrade. SEM observations also revealed that plastics inoculated with B. cereus and B. gottheilii had much rougher surfaces and bore crevices and holes.

This study has revealed two bacterial species with a capacity to degrade plastic and could serve as a solution to boost remediation of polluted mangrove sediments. Adding bacteria to sediments may be an “environmentally safe” method of plastic clean-up, but future work should focus on what effect if any, adding these microbes has on the community dynamics of the sediment. Also, subsequent work should try to establish the molecular and genetic pathways these microbes possess that are involved in microplastic degradation.

Paper reviewed:
Auta, H.S., Emenike, C.U., & Fauziah, S.H. (2017). Screening of Bacillus strains isolated from mangrove ecosystems in Peninsular Malaysia for microplastic degradation. Environmental pollution, 231, 1552-1559.

2 comments:

  1. The problems posed by plastic pollution, especially microplastics, often appear recalcitrant. It seems the plastic production is only set to increase and how does one even begin to clean up the seemingly infinite number of microplastic particles already in the natural environment?

    As you've mentioned, there seems to be a glut of studies addressing the impacts of marine plastic debris to the environment and wildlife however few offer any 'light at the end of the tunnel'. Therefore it's refreshing to be presented with a study addressing potential bioremediation. It seems that microbes may hold the answers to many of the issues we face; as we've learnt about bioremediation of oil pollution in Michael's lectures and now it appears they may also offer a feasible solution to microplastic pollution. Pretty cool!

    Out of interest, what was the size range of microplastic particles utilised within this study?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, Chloe. It does seem to me that research into microplastics is all doom and gloom and heavily focused on the effects they have on animals. The paper did go into some detail that a lot of remediation involves the use of chemicals to clear away the plastic, that might replace one problem with another if those chemicals aren't degradable. But it seems our microscopic friends might be a solution!
      As for the particle sizes they used, they weren't too specific. Any plastic that could slip through a 250 micron sieve was used so there would have been quite a range I expect.

      Delete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.