Polyethylene (PE) Is the most commonly produced plastic
that is discarded after use. A large amount of plastic eventually ends up
scattered throughout the oceans. Polymer type, environmental conditions and
season can affect the composition of a microbial biofilm. Plastic debris has a
hard, hydrophobic surface which is an ideal environment for settlers. It can
take as little as one week for a biofilm to form on plastic debris with the
biofilm community significantly differing from that of the surrounding the
environment. The degradation of PD is extremely slow and it is thought that
microorganisms may degrade PD in the environment. A few bacterial species have
been identified as PE degraders and recently marine fungus have also been shown
to have the potential to degrade PE.
Current studies on biofilm formation on plastics are
short term studies that do not assess the bacterial communities present on the
plastics. These studies are also carried out on random pieces of collected
plastic of unknow origin.
Long term exposure experiments (44 weeks) were carried
out in the Belgian part of the North Sea at two locations in the harbour of
Ostend and offshore, at the Thornton windmill park. The Harbour is affected by
land run-off, ship discharges and pollution through waste pipes while the off-shore
site is affected by activities from a wind farm and Fisheries.
Two types of PE with different colours and shapes were
chosen. Transparent plastic sheets and orange dolly ropes were used. Three
pieces of each were attached to an anchor and sent to the seafloor in both
locations and Samples were collected at different time points. Half of the
plastic was used for DNA extraction and half used in biofilm assays. Samples of
sea water and sediments were also collected at the same time.
From the first week, a coating containing a biofilm,
sediment particles, algae and macro-fouling species could be observed on
plastic sheets at the harbour. Bacterial and fungal communities were analysed
through metabarcoding and sample richness was assessed using OTU’s. Both showed
that the plastic sheets and dollies had similar assemblages of bacteria and
fungi in the harbour. At each timepoint the bacterial richness of the plastics
was higher than fungal richness.
The bacterial community in the harbour showed a gradual
change in abundance of bacterial classes over time. Alpha- and Gammaproteobacterial
are primary biofilm colonizers while Bacteroidetes
are secondary biofilm colonizers. There was a gradual shift between the two
types suggesting that there are time points in the development of biofilms.
This was not however seen on the dolly ropes.
25 bacterial core OTUs were identified on both plastic
types. These were then placed into 4 groups based on their core members. 1 –
neutral, without a clear period of high abundance, 2- higher abundance in the
beginning, 3- higher abundance in the middle and 4- OTUs with highest abundance
at the end of the exposure period.
Most of the fungal communities on the plastics could not
be assigned using the UNITE database. Some of the reads could be identified as
fungi using BLAST. This showed that Ascomycota
was highly abundant but there was no core group of fungal organisms showing
that fungi had high variability over time.
Offshore plastics had biofilm formation but it was much
less pronounced compared to the harbour. The amount of biofilm seen at 22 weeks
on the offshore site was similar in amount to the harbour site after 1 week.
Bacterial OTUs remained low in offshore compare to harbour up to week 18.
Fungal OTUs were similar between the two sites. Offshore sites did not have a
gradient of primary and secondary colonizers with levels remaining steady
throughout.
10 OTUs were identified in the offshore sites which were
dominated by Flavobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. When assessing the
fungal communities more of the offshore sequences were unassigned than in the
harbour. Fungal communities were like harbour communities in that there were no
core members and that Ascomycota and Basidiomycota dominated.
Overall three fungi identified to species level were
found on the plastic samples. These were more abundant on the harbour site and
have been previously identified as PE biodegraders. No previously identified
bacterial PE biodegraders were found in any of the plastic samples. This study
found that substrate degradation efficiency increased when a biofilm is formed
on the substrate and microbial populations had a higher metabolic activity when
in a biofilm compared to when in the planktonic form. Overall there was no
significant increase in biodegradation of plastics by microorganisms.
This study was limited by the lack of knowledge of marine
Fungi. Many marine fungi are not functionally characterized and little is known
about their biological functions and so their role in biodegradation of
plastics is little understood.
Temporal Dynamics of Bacterial and Fungal Colonization on
Plastic Debris in the North Sea
Tender et al., (2017)
‘Temporal Dynamics of Bacterial and Fungal Colonization on Plastic Debris in
the North Sea’, Environ. Sci. Technol
51, 7350−7360. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00697
Hi Chanelle,
ReplyDeleteThis is a really interesting review - thanks for posting it! I think how micro-organisms have the possibility to degrade plastics is fascinating, and could definitely be useful in the future!
I've added a link to a TED talk by two high-schoolers on how bacteria degrade phthalates that you might find interesting: https://www.ted.com/talks/two_young_scientists_break_down_plastics_with_bacteria
Regards,
Megan