It is commonly known that viral lysis of marine organisms,
such as microalgae and plankton, is an important source of carbon and nutrients
such as nitrogen for bacteria in the oceans. This influx of organic matter fuels
bacterial growth and shapes the way their communities form. In turn this has an
effect on microbial loop processes and therefore marine food webs.
While most studies focus on post-lysis effects, a recent
study by Sheik et al. (2013) looks at
exactly how viral infection of the unicellular algae Phaeocystis globosa (which often form large blooms in polar regions), affects surrounding bacterial populations from
the moment of infection to post-lysis stages.
To measure the bacterial communities surrounding P. globosa cells, a method called
CARD-FISH (catalysed reporter deposition-fluorescence in-situ hybridization)
was used. Measurements of the bacteria were taken at regular intervals, and this
was able to provide evidence of increasing population numbers, especially of
the gammaproteobacteria Alteromonas,
just 5 – 8 hours after viral infection of P.
globosa cells, before cell lysis at ~12 hours.
A combination of HISH and nanoSIMS was used to measure how
much carbon and nitrogen was assimilated by the bacterial populations. This
showed that ~20% of the measured C and N were leaked during early viral infection.
The leakage of organic matter from the infected but still intact
cells resulted in colonization of the infected algae by bacteria. I think this
is potentially due to the creation of a chemotactic gradient which attracts the
bacteria towards the source of the organic matter, similar to how bacteria find
sinking marine snow particles and plumes.
I believe this work is a step forward in understanding the degree
to which viruses impact bacterial communities in the ocean. It is a detailed
expansion of work already done on the effect of viral lysis on carbon and nitrogen
cycling by bacteria. It not only manages to quantify the bacterial communities
utilizing carbon and nitrogen released from infected algal particles, but also
provides us with a new niche to study by looking at the bacteria which colonize
infected algal particles. I think this paper can be used as a good base for better
understanding the processes behind algal blooms and their effects on oceanic
microbial processes.
Abdul R Sheik, C.
P. (2013). Responses of the coastal bacterial community to viral infection of
the algae Phaeocystis globosa. Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial
Ecology, 8, 212 - 225.
Did the paper comment as to how the C and N leaked from the cells while they were still intact? Do you think that the viruses may have been spread through aerosols (as looked at in Nuri's paper) as well as the surrounding water column? Also (sorry for so many questions), when the algal bloom collapses, what happens to the bacteria communities? Would they suffer from the lack of influx of C and N and so collapse too? Nice summary :)
ReplyDeleteHi Lucy,
ReplyDeleteThere was no mention of the particular methods by which C and N were leaked from the cells before lysis, but it was thought to either be increased/enhanced excretion or leakage, I would have thought both of these could be due to some sort of stress on the algal cell caused by infection or possibly a breakdown of the cell wall.
In this paper, the algal cultures were infected manually in a lab experiment by a single type of virus, and while there is no mention of how these viruses would spread, I would assume that infection of this type is possible by a range of viruses, and that it seems likely that they would be able to be dispersed through aerosols.
Bacterial community measurements were only taken up to 7 days (before the collapse of the bloom).
Thanks for answering my questions, I was also wondering if they had mentioned or thought of Phosphorous being affected too?
DeleteNo mention in this paper but would be interesting to follow up, I will have a read around!
Delete