Wednesday 16 November 2016

Melting sea ice represents the beginning of SML formation.

Climate change and in turn rising sea temperatures is one of the most prominent stressors the marine environment is facing today, making it a highly studied topic in marine biology. Sea ice is at an increasing risk from the record temperatures the Arctic environment is facing, sea ice harbours large amounts of polymeric substances produced by the microorganisms, which is released during sea ice retreat which can cause drastic changes in the cloud formation.  

Galgani et al., 2016 aimed to understand how retreating Arctic sea ice affects the organic composition of the sea surface microlayer (SML), and to determine the implications for marine primary organic aerosol (POA) release. 

Sampling took place on a research cruise in 2012 in the Arctic ocean 21 sites were sampled which were categorised into 3 types of sample site, t1=freshwater melt ponds, created from melting sea ice, t2= open melt ponds, created when the freshwater ponds become deeper and begin to mix with more saline waters, and t3= open sea samples. After sampling dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved amino acids (DHAA), dissolved uronic acids (DURA), bacteria abundance and marine gel particles (TEP and CSP) levels were all measured from all 21 sites. 

This study showed that the open ocean SML had an enrichment of DOC but no enrichment of bacteria compared to the freshwater melt ponds, although no enrichment the bacteria concentrations were significantly related to DOC, TEP abundance and TEP size. TEP abundance, volume concentrations and total area in the SML increased in the transition from fresh water melt ponds to the open sea samples. 
Interestingly the melt ponds (t1 and t2) had higher percentages of liable DOC compared to more saline water, the open ocean SML had more refractory DOC which is formed from the continuous working of DOC from bacteria and viruses.
In both the SML and the underlying water (ULW) the average TEP size increased with increasing salinity, supporting the idea that TEP formation is enhanced when divalent cations become increasing abundant at higher salinity. 

Melt pond SMLs represent dynamic exchange interfaces between the sea ice and the atmosphere, organic polymers in the SML of recently formed shallow melt ponds may be incorporated as gel into frost flowers and brine skim, potentially representing an important source for Arctic POA during melting periods, and contributing to the exchange of carbon dioxide during both melting and freezing. 

The authors observed DHAA in similar concentrations in all stages of ice melting and coomassie stainable particles (CSP) dominating gel abundances, they indicated that the transition towards first year ice (FYI) in the central Arctic ocean and the increasing number of melt ponds during the summer supports proteinaceous compounds in the SML and their contribution to Arctic aerosols. 
This paper nicely shows that melting sea ice releases trapped DOC, as well as creating enriched SMs in DHAA and proteinaceous gels, there is a nice story being told in this paper with the clear transition from melting sea ice, a SML forming and developing in the an appropiate SML for the open ocean. 

In the Arctic ocean, low wind speed and the absence of breaking waves, suggest that the transfer of organic compounds from the SML to the atmosphere may be mediated by bubble rising and bursting, which releases POA's, and diatom and phytoplankton exudes which nucleates ice under the cold Arctic conditions, forming high altitude ice clouds which can alter precipitation (Wilson et al., 2015).



Reviewed paper: Galgani, L., Piontek, J., & Engel, A. (2016). Biopolymers form a gelatinous microlayer at the air-sea interface when arctic sea ice melts. Scientific Reports6, 29465. doi:10.1038/srep29465, http://www.nature.com/articles/srep29465

Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M., Browse, J., … Murray, B. J. (2015). A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles. Nature525(7568), 234–238. doi:10.1038/nature14986, http://www.nature.com.plymouth.idm.oclc.org/nature/journal/v525/n7568/full/nature14986.html

2 comments:

  1. Hi Natasha,

    Thank you for your post. It seems that the authors provided quite a comprehensive physiochemical analysis, but left a lot to be desired in terms of the bacterial profiling. I noticed that the authors used flow cytometry to enumerate the bacterial cells, as opposed to gene profiling, so I wonder what your thoughts were regarding which taxa dominate the different areas? I would be too interested to see the phytoplankton studied in these areas (being the producers of TEP) and particularly to see which marine taxa could survive the osmotic stress of ice melt.

    Thanks,

    Davis

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Davis,
    Thank you for your comment, i agree with you that the bacterial enumeration was quite novice and a break down of what bacteria were present would add merit to this study. In terms of what microorganisms may be present i would expect Diatoms which release EPS, the paper does refer to one species Melosira arctica but there was no indication that they found this sp., bacteria wise you would expect similar taxa than the ones that dominate the SMLs in the rest of the world. Although i personally don't know how hardy the Alteromonas and Flavobacteria (and other related groups) are in terms of surviving the harsh temperatures in the Arctic as well as the localised salinity changes which are occurring.
    I think this is an area i think i do need to look into more to further understand the SML especially in these changing environments, thank you for questions it has definitely made me think about this topic more.
    Thanks,
    Natasha-lea

    ReplyDelete

Comments from external users are moderated before posting.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.